e8vkza
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 8-K/A
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
January 16, 2007
IRIDEX CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
0-27598
|
|
77-0210467 |
|
|
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(Commission File Number)
|
|
(IRS Employer |
incorporation)
|
|
|
|
Identification No.) |
1212 Terra Bella Avenue
Mountain View, California 94043
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(650) 940-4700
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the
filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction
A.2. below):
o |
|
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|
o |
|
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b)) |
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c)) |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Explanatory Note
IRIDEX Corporation, (the Company or IRIDEX) is filing this Amendment No. 1 on Form 8-K/A to
amend Item 9.01 of the Companys Form 8-K, originally filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on January 22, 2007 (the Original Filing). This amendment provides historical
financial statements and corresponding pro forma financial information related to the Aesthetics
Business (the Aesthetics Business) of Laserscope, a California corporation (Laserscope), a
wholly owned subsidiary of American Medical Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (AMS), acquired
by the Company pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement dated November 30, 2006 by and among AMS,
Laserscope and the Company, which was not available at the time of the Original Filing
ITEM 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
The following financial statements and pro forma information are included in this report:
(a) Financial Statements of Business Acquired
The Company has provided audited combined financial statements, including the Combined Statements
of Assets Sold and Liabilities Transferred and Statements of Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses
for the Aesthetics Business, for the periods ending December 30, 2006 and July 19, 2006, and for
the years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, attached hereto as Exhibit 99.5 and
incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Pro Forma Financial Information
The Company has also provided the required unaudited pro forma financial information for the
Company and the Aesthetics Business for the year ended December 30, 2006, attached hereto as
Exhibit 99.6 and incorporated herein by reference.
(d) Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
2.1*
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated November 30, 2006 by and among
American Medical Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
Laserscope, a California corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary
of American Medical Systems, Inc. and IRIDEX Corporation. |
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm related
to the financial statements for the aesthetics business of
Laserscope for the period of July 20, 2006 to December 30, 2006. |
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm related
to the financial statements for the aesthetics business of
Laserscope for the period of January 1, 2006 to July 19, 2006 and
for the years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. |
|
|
|
99.1**
|
|
Business Loan and Security Agreement by and among Iridex
Corporation and Mid-Peninsula Bank, part of Greater Bay Bank N.A.,
dated January 16, 2007. |
|
|
|
99.2**
|
|
Export-Import Bank Loan and Security Agreement by and among Iridex
Corporation and Mid-Peninsula Bank, part of Greater Bay Bank N.A.,
dated January 16, 2007. |
|
|
|
99.3**
|
|
Borrower Agreement by Iridex Corporation in favor of Export-Import
Bank of the United States and Mid-Peninsula Bank, part of Greater
Bay Bank N.A., dated January 16, 2007. |
|
|
|
99.4**
|
|
Press release dated January 17, 2007. |
|
|
|
99.5
|
|
Combined Statements of Assets Sold and Liabilities Transferred and
Statements of Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses for the
periods ending December 30, 2006 and July 19, 2006, and for the
years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. |
|
|
|
99.6
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed, Combined Financial Statements as
of December 31, 2006 and for the year ended December 31, 2006. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to IRIDEXs Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 6, 2006. |
|
** |
|
Previously filed Exhibits 99.1, 99.2, 99.3 and 99.4 to IRIDEXs Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
January 22, 2007. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IRIDEX CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Theodore a. Boutacoff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theodore A. Boutacoff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Date:
November 20, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
2.1*
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated November 30, 2006 by and among
American Medical Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
Laserscope, a California corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary
of American Medical Systems, Inc. and IRIDEX Corporation. |
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm related
to the financial statements for the aesthetics business of
Laserscope for the period of July 20, 2006 to December 30, 2006. |
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm related
to the financial statements for the aesthetics business of
Laserscope for the period of January 1, 2006 to July 19, 2006 and
for the years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. |
|
|
|
99.1**
|
|
Business Loan and Security Agreement by and among Iridex
Corporation and Mid-Peninsula Bank, part of Greater Bay Bank N.A.,
dated January 16, 2007. |
|
|
|
99.2**
|
|
Export-Import Bank Loan and Security Agreement by and among Iridex
Corporation and Mid-Peninsula Bank, part of Greater Bay Bank N.A.,
dated January 16, 2007. |
|
|
|
99.3**
|
|
Borrower Agreement by Iridex Corporation in favor of Export-Import
Bank of the United States and Mid-Peninsula Bank, part of Greater
Bay Bank N.A., dated January 16, 2007. |
|
|
|
99.4**
|
|
Press release dated January 17, 2007. |
|
|
|
99.5
|
|
Combined Statements of Assets Sold and Liabilities Transferred and
Statements of Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses for the
periods ending December 30, 2006 and July 19, 2006, and for the
years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. |
|
|
|
99.6
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements as of
December 31, 2006 and for the year ended December 31, 2006. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to IRIDEXs Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 6, 2006. |
|
** |
|
Previously filed Exhibits 99.1, 99.2, 99.3 and 99.4 to IRIDEXs Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
January 22, 2007. |
exv23w1
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8 (No.
333-32161, No. 333-57573, No. 333-86091, No. 333-45736, No. 333-67480, No. 333-97541, No.
333-107700, No. 333-117885, No. 333-127716 and No. 333-135822) of Iridex Corporation of our
report dated September 20, 2007 relating to the Combined Statements of Assets Sold and Liabilities
Transferred and Statements of Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses of the Aesthetics Business of
Laserscope (a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc.), as of December
30, 2006 and for the period from July 20, 2006 to December 30, 2006 (Successor), which appears in
this Current Report on Form 8-K/A of Iridex Corporation.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
November 20, 2007
exv23w2
Exhibit 23.2
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8 (No.
333-32161, No. 333-57573, No. 333-86091, No. 333-45736, No. 333-67480, No. 333-97541, No.
333-107700, No. 333-117885, No. 333-127716 and No. 333-135822) of Iridex Corporation of our
report dated September 20, 2007 relating to the Combined Statements of Assets Sold and Liabilities
Transferred and Statements of Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses of the Aesthetics Business of
Laserscope as of December 31, 2005 and for the period from January 1, 2006 to July 19, 2006 and for
the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 (Predecessor), which
appears in this Current Report on
Form 8-K/A of Iridex Corporation.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
November 20, 2007
exv99w5
Exhibit 99.5
AESTHETICS BUSINESS
A BUSINESS OF LASERSCOPE
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS SOLD AND LIABILITIES TRANSFERRED
AND STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND DIRECT OPERATING EXPENSES
As at December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 and for the periods ended
December 30, 2006 and July 19, 2006, and for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
1-2 |
Combined Statements of Assets Sold and Liabilities Transferred |
|
3 |
Combined Statements of Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses |
|
4 |
Notes to Combined Financial Statements |
|
5-16 |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Iridex Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying Combined Statements of Assets Sold and Liabilities Transferred and
Combined Statements of Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses of the Aesthetics Business (the
Business) of Laserscope (a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc.),
as of December 30, 2006 and for the period July 20, 2006 to December 30, 2006 (Successor). These
financial statements are the responsibility of the management of Laserscope and American Medical
Systems Holdings, Inc. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements
based on our audit
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
The accompanying combined financial statements were prepared for the purpose of complying with the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for inclusion in the Current Report
on Form 8-K of Iridex Corporation, as described in Note 1, and are not intended to be a complete
representation of the Business financial position or results of operations.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the assets sold and liabilities transferred of the Business at December 30, 2006 and the
revenues and direct operating expenses of the Business described in Note 1 for the period July 20,
2006 to December 30, 2006 (Successor), in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Business changed the manner in which it
accounts for share-based compensation in 2006.
/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
September 20, 2007
1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Iridex Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying Combined Statements of Assets Sold and Liabilities Transferred and
Combined Statements of Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses of the Aesthetics Business (the
Business) of Laserscope, as of December 31, 2005 and for the period January 1, 2006 to July 19,
2006 and for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 (Predecessor). These financial statements
are the responsibility of the management of Laserscope and American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc..
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
The accompanying combined financial statements were prepared for the purpose of complying with the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for inclusion in the Current Report
on Form 8-K of Iridex Corporation, as described in Note 1, and are not intended to be a complete
representation of the Business financial position or results of operations.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the assets sold and liabilities transferred of the Business at December 31, 2005 and the
revenues and direct operating expenses of the Business described in Note 1 for the period January
1, 2006 to July 19, 2006 and for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 (Predecessor), in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Business changed the manner in which it
accounts for share-based compensation in 2006.
/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
September 20, 2007
2
AESTHETICS BUSINESS
A BUSINESS OF LASERSCOPE
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS SOLD AND LIABILITIES TRANSFERRED
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
December 30, |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
ASSETS SOLD: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $1,750 and $356, respectively |
|
$ |
6,925 |
|
|
|
$ |
8,895 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
9,056 |
|
|
|
|
10,744 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
198 |
|
Machinery and equipment, net |
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
|
502 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
4,538 |
|
|
|
|
655 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
16,447 |
|
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets sold |
|
$ |
37,870 |
|
|
|
$ |
21,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES TRANSFERRED: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued compensation |
|
$ |
1,641 |
|
|
|
$ |
910 |
|
Warranty |
|
|
1,745 |
|
|
|
|
2,126 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
|
701 |
|
Customer contract liabilities |
|
|
3,338 |
|
|
|
|
3,652 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities transferred |
|
$ |
7,487 |
|
|
|
$ |
7,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets sold, net of liabilities transferred |
|
$ |
30,383 |
|
|
|
$ |
13,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial statements
3
AESTHETICS BUSINESS
A BUSINESS OF LASERSCOPE
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND DIRECT OPERATING EXPENSES
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 20, 2006 |
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
to |
|
|
|
2006 to |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 30, |
|
|
|
July 19, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
10,803 |
|
|
|
$ |
14,500 |
|
|
$ |
34,130 |
|
|
$ |
36,726 |
|
Service revenue |
|
|
3,013 |
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
6,049 |
|
|
|
6,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
13,816 |
|
|
|
$ |
18,500 |
|
|
$ |
40,179 |
|
|
$ |
42,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses (Note 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products |
|
|
8,177 |
|
|
|
|
6,814 |
|
|
|
13,585 |
|
|
|
17,055 |
|
Cost of services |
|
|
1,931 |
|
|
|
|
1,912 |
|
|
|
4,042 |
|
|
|
4,659 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
1,267 |
|
|
|
2,121 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
8,012 |
|
|
|
|
8,851 |
|
|
|
12,354 |
|
|
|
15,895 |
|
Litigation settlement (Note 12) |
|
|
2,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total direct operating expenses |
|
|
20,562 |
|
|
|
|
18,250 |
|
|
|
31,248 |
|
|
|
39,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Shortfall) excess of revenues over direct operating expenses |
|
$ |
(6,746 |
) |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
8,931 |
|
|
$ |
3,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial statements
4
AESTHETICS BUSINESS
A BUSINESS OF LASERSCOPE
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
1. Overview and Basis of Presentation
Overview
The Aesthetic Business (we, us, our, Aesthetics, our Business, or the Business)
operated as a business of Laserscope. We develop, manufacture, market and support lasers and other
light-based treatment devices used or useful in cosmetic, therapeutic, aesthetic and prophylactic
aesthetic applications and dermatology applications. We market our products and services worldwide.
Laserscope was acquired by American Medical Systems, Inc. (AMS,) on July 20, 2006. This
transaction resulted in the push-down of the effect of the acquisition of Laserscope by AMS and
created a new basis of accounting. As a result, the Combined Statements of Assets Sold and
Liabilities Transferred and the Combined Statements of Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses for
the period up to July 20, 2006 were presented as Predecessor, and the subsequent period financial
statements for the period July 20, 2006 to December 30, 2006 are presented as Successor. On
November 30, 2006, AMS entered into a definitive agreement for the sale of certain of the assets
and the transfer of certain liabilities of the Laserscope Aesthetic Business to Iridex Corporation
(Iridex). The transaction with Iridex closed on January 16, 2007 (see Note 15 Subsequent
Events).
Basis of presentation
The accompanying Combined Statements of Assets Sold and Liabilities Transferred of the
Business of the Predecessor as of December 31, 2005, and Combined Statements of Revenues and Direct
Operating Expenses for the period January 1, 2006 to July 19, 2006 and for the years ended December
31, 2005 and 2004, and the Combined Statement of Assets Sold and Liabilities Transferred of the
Business of the Successor as of December 30, 2006, and Combined Statement of Revenues and Direct
Operating Expenses for the period July 20, 2006 to December 30, 2006, have been prepared for the
purpose of complying with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for
inclusion in the Current Report on Form 8-K of Iridex Corporation. The Combined Statements of
Assets Sold and Liabilities Transferred include only specific assets and liabilities included in
the transaction defined in the Purchase and Sale Agreement between AMS and Iridex. Financial
statements were not previously prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
for our Business as it has no separate legal status or existence. Furthermore, there is no general
ledger for the Business on a stand-alone basis and complete balance sheets, income statements and
balance sheet and income statement detail have not been prepared for the Business. Cash management
functions were part of the Laserscope and AMS shared services organizations and were not performed
at the Business level. The information regarding cash management transactions was not allocated to
the Business and is not otherwise readily available. As a result, neither Laserscope nor AMS are
able to provide complete financial information for the Aesthetics Business. Based on the foregoing,
complete balance sheet and income statement information, and consequently cash flow information,
for the Business cannot be compiled, and therefore full audited financial statements are not
provided.
The accompanying Combined Statements of Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses include
historic revenues and direct operating expenses, of the Aesthetics Business. Expenses include
direct costs of products sold and services rendered, research and development costs, sales,
marketing and general administrative expenses directly attributable to or allocated to the
Aesthetics Business. Certain other expenses and income such as allocations of general
administrative support costs including accounting, treasury, tax and legal support, interest income
and interest expense and income taxes have been excluded from the accompanying combined statements
of revenues and operating expenses as it is not practical to isolate or allocate such expenses and
income to the Business. The accompanying Combined Statements of Assets Sold and Liabilities
Transferred have been derived from the accounting records of Laserscope and AMS using the
historical basis of assets and liabilities of the Business, subject to fair value adjustments to
inventories, machinery and equipment and intangibles related to the acquisition of Laserscope by
AMS on July 20, 2006. These combined financial statements are not intended to be a complete
representation of the financial position or results of operations for the Business as a stand-alone
going concern, nor are they indicative of the results to be expected from future operations of the
Business.
Management believes the assumptions and allocations underlying the Combined Statements of
Assets Sold and Liabilities Transferred and the related Combined Statements of Revenues and Direct
Operating Expenses are reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances. The expenses and cost
allocations have been determined on a basis that Laserscope, AMS and we consider to be a
5
reasonable reflection of the utilization of services provided or the benefit received by us
during the periods presented.
However, the amounts recorded for these transactions and allocations are not necessarily
representative of the amounts that would have been reflected in the financial statements had the
Business been an entity that operated independently of Laserscope and AMS. Consequently, the
Business future results of operations after separation from Laserscope and AMS will include costs
and expenses for the Business to operate as a business unit of Iridex Corporation, and these costs
and expenses may be materially different than the Business historical results of operations and
financial position. Accordingly, the financial statements for these periods are not indicative of
the Business future results and financial position.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of combination (Predecessor and Successor)
All significant intra-company transactions within the Business have been eliminated. All
intra-company transactions are considered to be effectively settled for cash at the time the
transaction is recorded. Certain assets and liabilities of our Business, which are included in
these statements, may, or may not be indicative of our Business on a stand-alone basis or as an
operating unit of Iridex.
Use of estimates
Preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make certain estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Trade accounts receivable
Trade accounts receivable are typically unsecured and are derived from revenues earned from
customers. We assess the credit worthiness of our customers prior to making a sale in order to
mitigate the risk of loss from customers not paying us. However, to account for the possibility
that a customer may not pay us, we maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts. We estimate losses
based on the overall business climate, our accounts receivable aging profile, and an analysis of
the circumstances associated with specific accounts which are past due.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost, determined on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis,
or market value. Work in progress and finished goods include direct labor and overhead costs
attributable to the goods manufactured. The Business includes demonstration units held for sale
within inventories. The Predecessor business carried the demonstration units at cost less
amortization over their estimated economic life of four years. On July 20, 2006, in connection with
the acquisition of Laserscope, the Successor revalued the demonstration units at fair market value
and revised the estimated economic lives to ten years. Amortization expense related to
demonstration units is recorded in cost of products and reflects the physical deterioration, usage
and obsolescence of the products. Proceeds from the sale of demonstration units are recorded as
revenue and all costs incurred to refurbish the systems prior to sale are charged to cost of
products.
We maintain reserves for our estimated obsolete or unmarketable inventory. Inventory reserves
are recorded when conditions indicate that the selling price may be less than cost due to factors
such as estimates about future demand, reductions in selling prices, physical deterioration, usage
and obsolescence. The reserves are equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the
estimated market value. Once established, the original cost of the inventory less the related
inventory reserve represents the new cost basis of such products. Reversal of these reserves is
recognized only when the related inventory has been scrapped or sold.
Machinery and equipment
Prior to July 20, 2006 the Predecessor business recorded machinery and equipment at cost less
accumulated depreciation and amortization. The Predecessor depreciated machinery and equipment
principally using accelerated methods over estimated useful lives of three to seven years. On July
20, 2006, in connection with the acquisition of Laserscope, the Successor revalued the machinery
and equipment at fair market value and revised the estimated useful lives to ten years.
Depreciation was recorded on a straight-line basis
6
over the assets remaining useful life from original acquisition date. Maintenance and repairs
are charged to operations as incurred.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of tangible and
identifiable intangible net assets acquired in business combinations. We perform an annual
assessment of our goodwill, or earlier if an event occurs or circumstances change that would reduce
the fair value of the Business below its carrying amount, as prescribed by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142. No impairment charges were recorded as of December 30, 2006
(Successor) and December 31, 2005 (Predecessor).
When we acquire another business, the purchase price is allocated, as applicable, between
in-process research and development (IPR&D), other identifiable intangible assets, tangible assets,
and goodwill as required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. IPR&D is defined as the
value assigned to those projects for which the related products have not received regulatory
approval, have no alternative future use, and is immediately expensed. The amount of the purchase
price allocated to intangible assets is determined by estimating the future cash flows of each
project or technology and discounting the net cash flows back to their present values. The discount
rate used is determined at the time of acquisition in accordance with accepted valuation methods.
Costs related to manufacturing, distribution and marketing of the products are included in the
projections. Also included are the expected research and development and clinical and regulation
expenses projected to be incurred to bring the product to market.
Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the tangible and
identifiable intangible net assets, including IPR&D, of acquired businesses. Under SFAS 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite-lives
are not amortized, but are assigned to the Business and tested for impairment annually or earlier
if an event occurs or circumstances change that would reduce the fair value of the Business below
its carrying amount. Intangible assets not deemed to have an indefinite-life are amortized over
their estimated useful lives.
The first step of the impairment test for goodwill compares the fair value of a reporting unit
with its carrying amount, including goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets. If the
fair value is less than the carrying amount, the second step determines the amount of the
impairment by comparing the implied fair value of the goodwill with the carrying amount of that
goodwill. An impairment charge is recognized only when the calculated fair value of a reporting
unit, including goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets, is less than its carrying amount.
Intangible assets include a technology license and other intellectual property for use in certain
laser and light-based systems. They are amortized using the straight-line method over their
respective estimated useful lives, generally five years.
Warranty
We provide for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. We
estimate the cost of our future warranty obligation based on actual material usage and service
delivery costs experienced in correcting product warranty failures over the preceding twelve
months.
Customer Contract Liabilities
The customer contract liabilities represent the historical carrying amount of deferred revenue
resulting from the unfulfilled commitments related to service contracts, product incentives,
installation and training. The risk and obligations related to such customer contracts transferred
to Iridex in connection with the sale of the Business in January 2007 (see Note 15, Subsequent
Events).
Revenue recognition
The Aesthetics Business revenue is primarily comprised of the sale and rental of laser
equipment and instrumentation, and service and parts revenue. The Business recognizes revenue in
accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements (SAB 104). Under this standard the following four criteria must be met in order to
recognize revenue:
1) Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;
7
2) Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;
3) Our selling price is fixed or determinable; and
4) Collectibility is reasonably assured.
The four revenue recognition criteria and other revenue related accounting pronouncements are
applied to our sales as described in the following paragraphs.
In international regions outside of the United Kingdom and France, the Business utilizes
distributors to market and sell the Business products. We recognize revenues upon shipment for
sales to these independent, third party distributors provided that we have no continuing
obligations subsequent to shipment. Generally, the Business distributors are responsible for all
marketing, sales, installation, training and warranty labor coverage for our products. The
Business standard terms and conditions do not provide price protection or stock rotation rights to
any of our distributors. In addition, our distributor agreements do not allow the distributor to
return or exchange products and the distributors are obligated to pay us for the sale regardless of
whether the distributor is able to resell the product.
Historically, we have allowed the return of a small number of lasers, and as of December 30,
2006, and December 31, 2005 we have recorded an allowance to cover such laser returns as a direct
reduction to revenues. In addition, we are usually willing to accept returns of small-dollar
accessories if the customer ordered the wrong part or quantity. The return of small-dollar
accessories has an insignificant impact on revenue. We are able to make reasonable estimates of
future returns based upon historical return rates and therefore we recognize revenue on all
products as they are shipped, provided that SAB 104 criteria have been met. Returns have an
insignificant impact on revenue as historical return rates have been low.
Certain sales of lasers have post-sale obligations of installation and advanced training.
These obligations are fulfilled after product shipment, and in these cases, we recognize revenue in
accordance with the multiple element accounting guidance set forth in Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. When we have objective and
reliable evidence of fair value of the undelivered elements we defer revenue attributable to the
post-shipment obligations and recognize such revenue when the obligation is fulfilled. Otherwise we
defer all revenue until all elements are delivered.
We provide incentives to customers that are accounted for under EITF 01-09, Accounting for
Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendors Products).
Customers are not required to provide documentation that would allow us to reasonably estimate the
fair value of the benefit received and we do not receive an identifiable benefit in exchange for
the consideration. Accordingly, the incentives are recorded as a reduction of revenue.
We occasionally provide consideration (in the form of cash or free products) to customers in
exchange for training services provided by such customers. Such consideration is treated as a sales
and marketing expense and not as a reduction of revenue, because we receive an identifiable benefit
and we can reasonably estimate the fair value of that benefit, based upon external market rates for
similar training and physicians services.
Service revenues are related to the provision of repair and maintenance services under various
types of arrangements. For customers who purchase fixed price service contracts, we recognize
service revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract. Payments received in
advance of services performed, normally for purchases of service contracts by our customers for a
specified period, are initially recorded as customer contract liabilities. For customers without
service contracts, we recognize service revenue when we provide service. We record spare parts
revenue upon shipment of the parts.
For all types of revenue we asses the credit worthiness of all customers in connection with
their purchases. We only recognize revenue when collectibility is reasonably assured.
Shipping and handling costs
Shipping and handling costs charged to customers are included in revenues, net and the
associated expense is included in cost of products and services sold in the Combined Statements of
Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses.
8
Research and development expense
Costs related to research, design and development of products are charged to research and
development expense as incurred. The types of costs included in research and development
expenditures include salaries, contractor fees, building costs, utilities, clinical evaluation, and
material costs.
Advertising expense
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising costs were not significant for the
period July 20, 2006 to December 30, 2006 (Successor) and the period January 1, 2006 to July 19,
2006 and for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 (Predecessor).
Share-based compensation
Prior to the acquisition of Laserscope by AMS on July 20, 2006, our employees participated in
the Laserscope share-based compensation plans. Prior to January 1, 2006 we accounted for
share-based employee compensation arrangements, based on Laserscopes stock, using the intrinsic
value method in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No.
25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25) and Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 44 (FIN 44), Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock
Compensation an Interpretation of APB No. 25. and complied with the disclosure provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Share-based
Compensation, as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Share-based Compensation Transition
and Disclosure Amendment of SFAS No, 123. Under APB 25, compensation expense is based on the
difference, if any, on the date of grant, between the fair value of Laserscopes stock and the
exercise price. Employee share-based compensation was amortized on a straight-line basis over the
vesting period of the underlying options. SFAS No. 123 defines a fair value based method of
accounting for an employee stock option or similar equity instrument. The Company accounts for
equity instruments issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123 and
EITF Issue No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees
for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods and Services (EITF Issue No. 96-18).
On January 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised
2004), Share-Based Payment, or SFAS 123(R), which requires the measurement and recognition of
compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including
stock options and employee stock purchases related to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan based on
fair values. In accordance with the modified prospective transition method used in adopting SFAS
123(R), the Business financial statements for prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and
do not include, the impact of SFAS 123(R).
Share-based compensation expense recognized is based on the value of the portion of
share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest. Share-based compensation expense
recognized in the Combined Statements of Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses for the period
January 1, 2006 to July 19, 2006 was $171,000 and includes compensation expense for share-based
payment awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of December 31, 2005 based on the grant date
fair value estimated in accordance with the pro forma provisions of SFAS 123 and compensation
expense for the share-based payment awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2005 based on the
grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R). Compensation
expense is based upon share-based payments that are expected to vest. SFAS 123(R) requires
forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods
if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
On July 20, 2006, Laserscopes shareholders approved a tender offer from AMS and agreed to
accelerate the vesting of all outstanding unvested options. The options of our employees under the
Laserscope share-based plans became fully vested on July 20, 2006, the date that the transaction
closed. The options were immediately exercised into shares of common stock and settled by AMS in
connection with its acquisition of Laserscope. The consideration for the options formed part of
AMS purchase consideration for Laserscope. During the period from July 20 to December 30, 2006,
employees of Laserscope did not receive or vest in any share-based payment awards, and accordingly
there was no share-based compensation expense recorded by the Business during this period.
Foreign Currency Translation
We have a foreign business in France which sells to customers in France, and we also have a
business in the United Kingdom which sells to customers in all of Europe, except France. Sales are
denominated in United States Dollars except for sales in the United Kingdom and France, which are
denominated in British Pound Sterling and Euro, respectively. In preparing our combined financial
statements, we are required to translate the financial statements of the foreign business from the
currency in which they keep their
9
accounting records into United States Dollars. Based on the criteria of SFAS No. 52 Foreign
Currency Translation our British and French businesses maintain their accounting records in their
functional currencies which are also their local currencies, the British
Pound Sterling and the Euro respectively. We are primarily located in the United States.
Therefore, all assets and liabilities of the British and French business are translated into
United States Dollars using current exchange rates, and revenue and expenses are translated using
average exchange rates in effect during each period.
Litigation
At the end of each accounting period, we review all outstanding legal matters. If we believe
it is probable that we will incur a loss as a result of the resolution of a legal matter and we can
reasonably estimate the amount of the loss, we record our best estimate of the potential loss. New
developments in legal matters can cause changes in previous estimates and result in significant
changes in loss accruals. If current legal matters are resolved in a manner unfavorable to us, they
could have a material adverse impact on our financial results, financial position, or future cash
flows.
3. Purchase Accounting for Acquisition of Laserscope by AMS
On July 20, 2006, AMS acquired Laserscope. AMS accounted for its acquisition of Laserscope in
accordance with SFAS 141, Business Combinations. Accordingly, the aggregate Laserscope purchase
price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on AMSs estimated fair
values at the date of acquisition. These financial statements reflect the push-down of the effect
of the acquisition of Laserscope by AMS and the creation of a new basis of accounting. The fair
value of the identifiable tangible and intangible assets and goodwill, net of liabilities assumed,
pushed-down to the Aesthetics Business as at July 20, 2006, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
7,596 |
|
Developed and core technology |
|
|
9,482 |
|
Trademarks |
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
|
17,906 |
|
Tangible assets acquired, net of liabilities assumed |
|
|
12,556 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
4,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair value of the Aesthetics Business identifiable and
intangible assets and goodwill, net of cash acquired and
liabilities assumed |
|
$ |
35,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
The determination of the portion of the purchase price allocated to Laserscopes customer
relationships, developed and core technology and trademarks was based on our forecasted cash
inflows and outflows and using an excess earnings method to calculate the fair value of assets
purchased. We are responsible for these estimated values, and we considered other factors including
an independent valuation of our assumptions. Tangible assets acquired, net of liabilities assumed,
were stated at fair value at the date of acquisition based on managements assessment and third
party appraisals.
4. Inventories
Inventories consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
December 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
5,028 |
|
|
$ |
5,581 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
1,503 |
|
|
|
931 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
2,525 |
|
|
|
4,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
9,056 |
|
|
$ |
10,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with the product supply agreement entered into between AMS and Iridex, the raw
materials and work-in-process will be transferred to Iridex during the manufacturing transition
period not to exceed nine months (see Note 15 Subsequent Events).
10
5. Machinery and Equipment
Machinery and equipment consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
December 30, |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized laser systems |
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
|
$ |
485 |
|
Capitalized testing equipment |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service toolkits |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
Office equipment and furniture |
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
|
942 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(347 |
) |
|
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total machinery and equipment |
|
$ |
683 |
|
|
|
$ |
502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Combined Statements of Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses includes depreciation
expense of $80 for the period July 20, 2006 to December 30, 2006 (Successor), $406 for the period
January 1, 2006 to July 20, 2006, and $378 and $411 for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004
(Predecessor), respectively.
6. Goodwill
Predecessor goodwill of $655 at December 31, 2005, comprised the Aesthetics Business goodwill
arising on the acquisition of the remaining 25% minority interest in Laserscope France S.A. in
September 2001. The Business reviewed the goodwill for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142,
and concluded that no impairment charge was necessary during the period from January 1, 2004 up to
July 20, 2006.
Successor goodwill of $4,538 at December 30, 2006, comprises the goodwill pushed-down to the
Aesthetics Business as part of the acquisition of Laserscope by AMS on July 20, 2006. (see Note 3,
Purchase Accounting for Acquisition of Laserscope by AMS ). The Business reviewed this goodwill
for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142, and concluded that no impairment charge was
necessary during the period July 20, 2006 to December 30, 2006.
7. Intangible Assets
As discussed in Note 3, the fair value of the Aesthetics Business intangible assets acquired
as part of the acquisition of Laserscope by AMS pushed-down in these financial statements amounted
to $17,906. The developed core technology and trademarks are being amortized over the estimated
remaining product lifecycles of one to ten years. The customer relationships are being amortized
over the remaining or estimated periods of the agreements.
11
The changes in the carrying amount of intangible assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 20, 2006 |
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
to |
|
|
|
2006 to |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 30, |
|
|
|
July 19, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed and core technology |
|
$ |
9,482 |
|
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(955 |
) |
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net developed and core technology |
|
$ |
8,527 |
|
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service agreements |
|
$ |
5,566 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Distribution agreement |
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net customer relationships |
|
$ |
7,166 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks |
|
$ |
828 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trademarks |
|
$ |
754 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology license |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
283 |
|
|
$ |
283 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net technology license |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
$ |
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
16,447 |
|
|
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Combined Statements of Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses includes amortization
expense on the intangible assets of $1,729 for the period July 20, 2006 to December 30, 2006
(Successor), $ 62 for the period January 1, 2006 to July 20, 2006, and $85 for the year ended
December 31, 2005 (Predecessor).
8. Warranty and Service Contracts
Warranty
We have a direct field service organization that provides service for products. We generally
provide a twelve month warranty on laser systems. After the warranty period, maintenance and
support is provided on a service contract basis or on an individual call basis. Our warranties and
premium service contracts provide for a 99.0% Uptime Guarantee on laser systems. Under provisions
of this guarantee, at the request of the customer, we extend the terms of the related warranty or
service contract if specified system uptime levels are not maintained.
We currently provide for the estimated cost to repair or replace products under warranty at
the time of sale. The cost estimate is based on warranty costs experienced in the prior 12 months,
and the outstanding warranty liability is revalued on a quarterly basis.
A summary of the warranty accrual activity is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 20, 2006 |
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
to |
|
|
|
2006 to |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 30, |
|
|
|
July 19, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
1,812 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,126 |
|
|
$ |
1,524 |
|
Add: Accruals for warranties issued during the period |
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
2,623 |
|
Less: Settlements made during the period |
|
|
(698 |
) |
|
|
|
(812 |
) |
|
|
(2,021 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance |
|
$ |
1,745 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,812 |
|
|
$ |
2,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Lease Obligations
We lease certain facilities and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases. Rent expense
under these leases amounted to $137 for the period July 20, 2006 to December 30, 2006 (Successor),
$206 for the period January 1, 2006 to July 20, 2006, and $265 and $684 for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 (Predecessor), respectively.
Future minimum lease payments under capital and operating leases transferable to Iridex were
as follows at December 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
Leases |
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
328 |
|
2008 |
|
|
291 |
|
2009 |
|
|
220 |
|
2010 |
|
|
110 |
|
2011 |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into contractual arrangements under which we may
agree to indemnify the third party to such arrangement from any losses incurred relating to the
services they perform on our behalf or for losses arising from certain events as defined within the
particular contract, which may include, for example, patents, litigation or claims relating to past
performance. Such indemnification obligations may not be subject to maximum loss clauses.
Historically, payments made related to these indemnifications have been immaterial.
Contingencies
We are at times a party to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of its business.
While it is not feasible to predict or determine the outcome of the actions brought against us, our
management believes that the ultimate resolution of these claims will not ultimately have a
material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations or future cash flows.
Legal fees in connection with loss contingencies are recognized as the fees are incurred.
10. Share-Based Compensation
Our employees participated in Laserscopes various incentive plans, including employee
share-based purchase and incentive plans. Had compensation cost for share-based employee
compensation arrangements been determined based on the fair value at the date of the awards
consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the impact on the excess (shortfall) of revenue
over direct operating expenses would be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Excess of revenue over direct operating expenses as reported |
|
$ |
8,931 |
|
|
$ |
3,112 |
|
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined
under fair value based method for all awards, net of related
tax effects |
|
|
(2,752 |
) |
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of revenues over direct operating expenses pro forma |
|
$ |
6,179 |
|
|
$ |
2,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
The following table summarizes activity related to the Aesthetics Business employees in the
stock option plans during the period July 20, 2006 to December 30, 2006 (Successor), the period
January 1, 2006 to July 19, 2006 and the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 (Predecessor):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in dollars) |
Balance, January 1, 2004 (Predecessor) |
|
|
185,858 |
|
|
$ |
5.27 |
|
Granted |
|
|
29,600 |
|
|
$ |
25.16 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(46,049 |
) |
|
$ |
3.15 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004 (Predecessor) |
|
|
169,409 |
|
|
$ |
9.32 |
|
Granted |
|
|
54,500 |
|
|
$ |
30.24 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(23,826 |
) |
|
$ |
5.32 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(2,637 |
) |
|
$ |
15.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005 (Predecessor) |
|
|
197,446 |
|
|
$ |
15.50 |
|
Granted |
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
$ |
20.65 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(33,334 |
) |
|
$ |
6.57 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, July 19, 2006 (Predecessor) |
|
|
176,512 |
|
|
$ |
17.61 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(139,312 |
) |
|
$ |
13.29 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(37,200 |
) |
|
$ |
33.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 30, 2006 (Successor) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upon adoption of SFAS 123(R), we elected to value our share-based payment awards granted based
on the Laserscope stock, beginning in fiscal year 2006 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model, or the Black-Scholes model, which we previously used for the pro forma information required
under SFAS 123. The determination of fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes model is affected by the Laserscope stock price as well as the input of
other subjective assumptions. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, the expected term
of stock options and the expected stock price volatility of the Laserscope stock over the term of
the awards.
The fair value of options granted and the option component of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan
shares were estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The
assumptions used to value the option grants and purchase rights are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
Predecessor Year |
|
Predecessor Year |
|
|
January 1, 2006 to |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
|
July 19, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Risk free interest rate for options |
|
|
5.09 |
% |
|
|
4.05 |
% |
|
|
3.26 |
% |
Risk free interest rate for ESPP rights |
|
|
4.92 |
% |
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
1.15 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility for options |
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
84 |
% |
Volatility for ESPP rights |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
66 |
% |
Expected option life (in years) |
|
|
3.91 |
|
|
|
4.19 |
|
|
|
4.45 |
|
Expected life for ESPP rights (in years) |
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
The weighted average per share grant date fair values of employee stock options granted, based
on the Laserscope stock, in 2005 and 2004 were $17.02 and $16.01, respectively. The weighted
average per share fair values of options granted under the ESPP in 2005 and 2004 were $11.80 and
$8.79, respectively. On July 20, 2006, all outstanding Laserscope options were settled for cash at
$31.00 per outstanding option based on a tender offer from AMS.
14
11. Employee Savings and Investment Plan
Our employees participated in the Laserscope 401(k) savings and investment plan. Our
contributions to the plan have been 50% matching of employee contributions up to 5% of each
employees base compensation and were $39 for the period July 20, 2006 to December 30, 2006
(Successor), $39 for the period January 1, 2006 to July 19, 2006, and $74 and $98 for the years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 (Predecessor), respectively.
12. Litigation Settlement
Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. (Palomar) disputed the method used by Laserscope for
calculating the royalty to be paid on the Lyra laser system pursuant to the Patent License
Agreement between Laserscope and Palomar (the License Agreement). Palomar also disputed
Laserscopes application of the License Agreement to the Gemini laser system, including
Laserscopes calculation of royalties due on the Gemini laser system under the License Agreement.
On October 18, 2006 Laserscope entered into an agreement with Palomar to settle the dispute. Under
the terms of the agreement, Laserscope was required to pay two equal installments of $1,080 to
Palomar. The settlement cost of $2,177 including legal expenses of $17 related to the dispute was
recorded by the Aesthetics Business during the period ended December 30, 2006.
13. Segment Information
The Business has only one reportable segment, the Aesthetics Business.
Revenues from sales to external customers by major geographic area were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 20, 2006 |
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
to |
|
|
|
2006 to |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 30, |
|
|
|
July 19, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
By major
geographic area(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
9,238 |
|
|
|
$ |
12,452 |
|
|
$ |
27,705 |
|
|
$ |
31,246 |
|
Europe(2) |
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
|
5,787 |
|
|
|
9,603 |
|
|
|
9,089 |
|
Asia Pacific(2) |
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
2,538 |
|
|
|
2,221 |
|
Rest of world(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,816 |
|
|
|
$ |
18,500 |
|
|
$ |
40,179 |
|
|
$ |
42,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on the location of the external customer. |
|
(2) |
|
Individual countries within each of these geographic regions represent less than 10% of
total revenues. |
Locations of machinery and equipment by major geographic area were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor |
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
|
December 30, |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
609 |
|
|
|
$ |
399 |
|
France |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
683 |
|
|
|
$ |
502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Financial Instruments with Market Risks, Concentrations of Customer and Credit Risk, and Other
Risks
Our trade receivables are made up of amounts due from our health care industry customers,
primarily in the United States of America, Europe and Asia Pacific. Our former United States
distributor, McKesson, accounted for approximately 0%, 13%, 18% and 55% of our revenues for the
period July 20, 2006 to December 30, 2006 (Successor), January 1, 2006 to July 19, 2006, and for
the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 (Predecessor), respectively. Another customer, Henry
Schein, accounted for approximately
15
22%, 19%, 6% and 0% of our revenues for the period July 20, 2006 to December 30, 2006
(Successor), January 1, 2006 to July 19, 2006, and for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004
(Predecessor), respectively. We had no other customers whose purchases were 10% or more of net
revenues in the periods presented. At December 30, 2006 (Successor) and December 31, 2005
(Predecessor), McKessons accounts receivable balance was approximately $400 and 5% and $500 and
5%, respectively, of our total accounts receivable, and Henry Scheins accounts receivable balance
was approximately $1,500 and 20% and $1,400 and 15% respectively, of our total accounts receivable.
We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and maintain reserves for potential credit
losses. Historically, such losses have been within our expectations.
Certain of the components used in our laser products are purchased from single sources. These
single-source suppliers are located in both the United States and overseas. While we believe that
most of these components are available from alternate sources, an interruption of these or other
supplies could adversely affect our ability to manufacture lasers.
15. Subsequent Events
On January 16, 2007, our Business was sold to Iridex Corporation (Iridex) for a sale price
consisting of approximately $26,000 of cash consideration, $2,000 of Iridex stock, and up to an
additional $9,000 as determined by the book value of certain inventory following termination of a
manufacturing transition period of approximately six to nine months. The cash consideration is
subject to adjustment, based on the amounts of certain assets and liabilities at the date of the
closing of the transaction. The terms of the sale includes an obligation on the part of AMS to
indemnify Iridex against certain potential liabilities, including for breaches of representations
and warranties made by AMS in the asset purchase agreement, for a period of twelve months.
In conjunction with the sale of our Business, AMS entered into a product supply agreement with
Iridex whereby AMS agreed to manufacture and supply to Iridex certain aesthetics devices during a
transition period not to exceed nine months. During the initial six months of this agreement,
Iridex will reimburse AMS for the cost to produce the products. After the initial six months,
Iridex will reimburse AMS at cost plus a markup of 20 percent. Iridex may terminate this agreement
at any time upon 90 days written notice. In addition, AMS also entered into an agreement with
Iridex to provide administrative services at no charge during a transition period of 60 days.
On August 14, 2007, AMS entered into a Settlement Agreement with Iridex which amends the
Product Supply Agreement which was entered into at the time of acquisition to purchase at the end
of such agreement, quantities of work-in-process, raw and packaging materials, or spare and
replacement parts that have an aggregate book value of $4.1 million. In addition under the
Settlement Agreement, Iridex will make an additional payment to AMS of approximately $1.2 million,
which will be the sole and final adjustment to the purchase price. The parties have also agreed
subject to certain limitations, to release each other from any claims related to indemnification,
purchase price and post-closing adjustments in the Purchase Agreement as well as any amounts due
under the Product Supply Agreement.
16
exv99w6
Exhibit 99.6
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 and the
unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for
the year ended December
31, 2006 are based upon the historical financial statement of the Aesthetics Business of Laserscope
Corporation after giving effect to Iridexs acquisition of the Aesthetics Business using the
purchase method of accounting and applying the assumptions and adjustments described in the
accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements as if such
acquisition had occurred as of December 31, 2006 for pro forma balance sheet purposes and as of the
first day of fiscal 2006 for pro forma statement of operation purposes.
The acquisition has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141. Business Combinations. Under the
purchase method of accounting, the total purchase price, calculated as described in Note 1 to these
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements, is allocated to the net tangible and
intangible assets acquired in connection with the acquisition, based on their estimated fair
values. Management has made an allocation of the purchase price to the tangible and intangible
assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on various estimates. The allocation of the purchase
price is subject to further refinement pending finalization of these estimates. Final purchase
accounting adjustments may differ materially from the pro forma adjustments presented herein.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements have been prepared by management
for illustrative purposes only and do not include the realization of cost savings from operating
efficiencies, revenue synergies or other costs expected to result from the acquisition. The
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are therefore not necessarily
indicative of the condensed consolidated financial positions or results of operation in future
periods that would actually have been realized had Iridex and the Aesthetics Business been a
combined company during the specified period.
The pro forma adjustments are based on information available at the time of this document. The
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements, including the notes thereto, should be
read in conjunction with Iridexs historical consolidated financial statements included in its
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the Combined Statements of
Assets sold and Liabilities Transferrred and Combined Statements of Revenues and Operating Expenses
of the Aesthetics Business historical financial statements as of and for the year ended December
31, 2006, which are included as Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 8-K/A.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2006
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IRIDEX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
IRIDEX |
|
|
Aesthetics |
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IRIDEX |
|
|
|
Corporation |
|
|
Business |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation |
|
|
|
HISTORICAL |
|
|
HISTORICAL |
|
|
(Note 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
ASSETS : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
21,051 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(11,234 |
) |
|
|
(a |
) |
|
$ |
9,817 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
6,052 |
|
|
|
6,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,977 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
9,499 |
|
|
|
9,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,555 |
|
Prepaids and other current assets |
|
|
1,264 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
$ |
37,866 |
|
|
$ |
16,202 |
|
|
$ |
(11,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
Other long term assets |
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,447 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,538 |
|
|
|
(4,538 |
) |
|
|
(f |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,153 |
|
|
|
(d |
) |
|
|
9,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
40,177 |
|
|
$ |
37,870 |
|
|
$ |
(6,619 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
71,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
1,830 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(i |
) |
|
$ |
1,830 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
2,392 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
9,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,905 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
1,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,158 |
|
Warranty |
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
1,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,611 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
3,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
8,020 |
|
|
$ |
7,487 |
|
|
$ |
9,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term Debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,000 |
|
|
|
(b |
) |
|
$ |
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Preferred Stock, $.01 par value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized: 2,000,000 shares; |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Issued and outstanding: none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 par value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized: 30,000,000 shares; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding: 7,841,781 shares
in 2006 and 7,520,358 shares in 2005 |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(e |
) |
|
|
81 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
29,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,012 |
|
|
|
(e |
) |
|
|
31,709 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(430 |
) |
Retained earnings- Prior Year |
|
|
2,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
32,157 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
40,177 |
|
|
$ |
7,487 |
|
|
$ |
23,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
71,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed combined pro forma financial statements
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
(In thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
IRIDEX |
|
|
AESTHETICS |
|
|
PRO FORMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IRIDEX |
|
|
|
CORPORATION |
|
|
BUSINESS |
|
|
ADJUSTMENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation |
|
|
|
HISTORICAL |
|
|
HISTORICAL |
|
|
(NOTE 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
35,904 |
|
|
$ |
32,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
68,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
17,099 |
|
|
|
18,834 |
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
(c |
) |
|
|
37,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
18,805 |
|
|
$ |
13,482 |
|
|
$ |
(1,938 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
5,511 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,449 |
|
Sales, general and administrative |
|
|
18,059 |
|
|
|
16,863 |
|
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
(c |
) |
|
|
36,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
(h |
) |
|
|
|
|
Litigation settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
operating expenses |
|
$ |
23,570 |
|
|
$ |
19,978 |
|
|
$ |
1,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
$ |
(4,765 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,496 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(15,104 |
) |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
(g |
) |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
$ |
(4,032 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,496 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(14,762 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(1,721 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,721 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(5,753 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,496 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(16,483 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per common share |
|
$ |
(0.75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per common share |
|
$ |
(0.75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing net loss per share basic |
|
|
7,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
(e |
) |
|
|
7,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used
in computing net loss per common share diluted |
|
|
7,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
(e |
) |
|
|
7,926 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed combined pro forma financial statements
Note 1. Description of transaction. On January 16, 2007, the Company completed the
acquisition of the aesthetics business from American Medical Systems, Inc. (AMS) and Laserscope,
a wholly owned subsidiary of AMS pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement dated
November 30, 2006 between AMS, Laserscope, and Iridex Corporation.
The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 and
the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations
for the year ended
December 31, 2006 are based upon the historical financial statements of the Aesthetics Business of
Laserscope Corporation after giving effect to Iridexs acquisition of the Aesthetics Business using
the purchase method of accounting and applying the assumptions and adjustments described in the
accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements as if such
acquisition had occurred as of December 31, 2006 for pro forma balance sheet purposes and as of the
first day of fiscal 2006 for pro forma statement of operation purposes.
Iridex management has made a preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the tangible and
intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon estimates of fair value using
information currently available. The fair value allocation will be finalized in 2007. The
preliminary estimated purchase price of the acquisition is estimated to be approximately $35
million, which has been determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Cash paid on closing |
|
$ |
26,000 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
2,014 |
|
Cost of raw material and in-process inventory |
|
|
6,531 |
|
Post closing adjustment to purchase price |
|
|
(2,766 |
) |
Acquisition costs |
|
|
3,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
34,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock included 213,435 shares of common stock valued at $9.43 per share.
Acquisition costs include investment banking, legal and accounting fees, and other external
costs directly related to the acquisition.
Net assets acquired consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
6,925 |
|
Inventory, net |
|
|
9,056 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
221 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
683 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
16,447 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
9,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of net assets acquired |
|
$ |
42,485 |
|
Less liabilities assumed |
|
|
(7,487 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
34,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the Companys intangible assets are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible
assets acquired |
|
Useful Lives |
|
Gross Carrying Value |
|
Gemini Handset core technology |
|
10 years |
|
|
$ |
2,995 |
|
Gemini current technology |
|
4 years |
|
|
|
5,129 |
|
Other Products current technology |
|
1 year |
|
|
|
341 |
|
Accessories current technology |
|
4 years |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Services Contractual customer relationships |
|
10 years |
|
|
|
5,318 |
|
Contractual Distribution Agreement |
|
5 years |
|
|
|
1,848 |
|
Trade Name |
|
5 years |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Intangible Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
of $9,153 represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of net
tangible and intangible assets acquired. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, goodwill will not be
amortized but will instead be tested for impairment annually or more frequently if certain
indicators are present.
In addition, the Asset Purchase Agreement signed with AMS calls for a post-close adjustment
mechanism which in effect allows for an adjustment to the final purchase price based upon the
parties agreement to the final closing balance sheet and several other items. The Company has
recorded $2.8 million due from AMS as an adjustment to the purchase price as determined under the
terms of the asset purchase agreement and based on a settlement with AMS regarding this post close
adjustment dated August 14, 2007.
Note 2. Pro forma adjustments. The unaudited pro form condensed combined financial
statements have been prepared as if the acquisition had occurred as of December 31, 2006 for pro
forma balance sheet purposes and as of the first day of fiscal year 2006 for purposes of the
statement of operations and reflect the following adjustments:
(a) To record the cash payment of $14.0 million related to the acquisition less the final
purchase price adjustment of $2.8 million agreed in August 2007.
(b) To record the use of loan proceeds of $12.0 million for the aesthetics business
acquisition.
(c) To record the pro forma incremental amortization of $2.99 million on the fair value of
indentifiable intangible assets acquired.
(d)
To record the preliminary value of goodwill of $9.2 million (see Note 1).
(e) To record the issuance of 213,435 shares of common stock at $9.43 per share per terms
of the purchase agreement.
(f) To remove historical aesthetics business goodwill.
(g) To record the estimated reduction in interest income in 2006 due to reduced cash
balances from the use of $11.2 million for the acquisition.
(h) To record interest expense calculated using historical prime rates for 2006 on $12.0
million of long term debt used for aesthetics business acquisition.
(i) To record acquisition costs and liability for raw material and work in process
inventory related to the acquisition.
Note 3. Bank Borrowings. On January 16, 2007, the Company entered into a Business Loan and
Security Agreement with Mid-Peninsula Bank, part of Greater Bay Bank N.A. and Exim Bank. The Credit
Agreement provides for an asset-based revolving line of credit of up to $6.0 million and a $6.0
million term loan. The Companys obligations under the Term Loans and the Revolving Loans are
secured by a lien on substantially all of the Companys assets. Interest on the Term Loan and the
Revolving Loans is the prime rate as published in the Wall Street Journal, minus 0.5%. These
facilities contain certain financial and other covenants.