UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 10-Q

[X]  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
     ACT  OF  1934

     For  the  quarterly  period  ended  October  2,  2004

[ ]  TRANSITION  REPORT  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  13  OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
     EXCHANGE  ACT  OF  1934

     For  the  Transition  period  from __________ to _________

                        Commission File Number: 0-27598

                               IRIDEX CORPORATION

             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

              Delaware                                           77-0210467
              --------                                           ----------
  (State or other jurisdiction of                             (I.R.S. employer
   incorporation or organization)                            identification No.)

                            1212 TERRA BELLA AVENUE
                      MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA 94043-1824
          (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

                                 (650) 940-4700
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the  preceding  12  months  (or  for such shorter period that the registrant was
required  to  file  such  reports),  and  (2)  has  been  subject to such filing
requirements  for  the  past  90  days. Yes [X]  No [ ]

Indicate  by  check  mark  whether  the  registrant  is an accelerated filer (as
defined  in  Rule  12b-2  of  the  Exchange  Act). Yes [ ]  No [X]

                        APPLICABLE TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

The  number of shares of common stock, $.01 par value, issued and outstanding as
of  November  10,  2004  was  7,374,641.


IRIDEX CORPORATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ---- PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 2, 2004 and January 3, 2004 3 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003 4 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003 5 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and nine months ended October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003 6 Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 7 ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 12 ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 27 ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 28 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 29 ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS 29 ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES 29 ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS 29 ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION 29 ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K 29 SIGNATURE 30 CERTIFICATIONS 31 Exhibit 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) Exhibit 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - --------------------------------------------------- IRIDEX CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (IN THOUSANDS) (UNAUDITED) OCTOBER 2, JANUARY 3, 2004 2004 ------------ ------------ ASSETS ------ Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,612 $ 10,541 Available-for-sale securities . . . . . . . . 9,511 5,751 Accounts receivable, net. . . . . . . . . . . 6,516 6,548 Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,405 8,721 Prepaids and other current assets . . . . . . 738 934 Current deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . 972 972 ------------ ------------ Total current assets. . . . . . . . . . . . 34,754 33,467 Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . 772 850 Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,129 1,522 ------------ ------------ Total assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 37,655 $ 35,839 ============ ============ LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY ------------------------------------ Current liabilities: Accounts payable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 950 $ 1,029 Accrued expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,613 3,380 Deferred revenue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 789 596 ------------ ------------ Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,352 5,005 ------------ ------------ Stockholders' equity: Common stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 70 Additional paid-in capital. . . . . . . . . . 24,988 23,900 Accumulated other comprehensive loss. . . . . (20) (1) Treasury stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (430) (430) Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,691 7,295 ------------ ------------ Total stockholders' equity. . . . . . . . . 31,303 30,834 ------------ ------------ Total liabilities and stockholders' equity. $ 37,655 $ 35,839 ============ ============ The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements. 3

IRIDEX CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) (UNAUDITED) THREE MONTHS ENDED NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 2, SEPTEMBER 27, OCTOBER 2, SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 2003 2004 2003 --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,178 $ 8,267 $ 23,679 $ 22,928 Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,708 4,678 13,187 12,981 --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Gross profit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,470 3,589 10,492 9,947 --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Operating expenses: Research and development. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,025 975 3,409 2,972 Sales, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . 3,855 2,402 8,452 7,430 --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Total operating expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,880 3,377 11,861 10,402 --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Income (loss) from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,410) 212 (1,369) (455) Interest and other income, net. . . . . . . . . . . 83 49 212 154 --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . (1,327) 261 (1,157) (301) Benefit from income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . 607 - 553 181 --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (720) $ 261 $ (604) $ (120) =============== =============== =============== =============== Net income (loss) per share - basic . . . . . . . . . . ($0.10) $ 0.04 ($0.08) ($0.02) =============== =============== =============== =============== Net income (loss) per share - diluted . . . . . . . . . ($0.10) $ 0.04 ($0.08) ($0.02) =============== =============== =============== =============== Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share - Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,244 6,933 7,171 6,922 =============== =============== =============== =============== Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share - diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,244 7,043 7,171 6,922 =============== =============== =============== =============== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements. 4

IRIDEX CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (IN THOUSANDS) (UNAUDITED) NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 2, SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 2003 --------------- --------------- Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (604) $ (120) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296 561 Provision for doubtful accounts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287 35 Provision for inventories. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 429 348 Deferred income taxes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (607) - Changes in operating assets and liabilities: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts receivable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (255) 1,777 Inventories. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (113) 930 Prepaids and other current assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196 (179) Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (79) 219 Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,233 (170) Deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193 184 --------------- --------------- Net cash provided by operating activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 976 3,585 --------------- --------------- Cash flows from investing activities: Purchases of available-for-sale securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (8,960) (6,640) Proceeds from maturity of available-for-sale securities. . . . . . . . . . . . 5,181 1,850 Acquisition of property and equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (218) (273) --------------- --------------- Net cash used in investing activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3,997) (5,063) --------------- --------------- Cash flows from financing activities: Issuance of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,092 92 --------------- --------------- Net cash provided by financing activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,092 92 --------------- --------------- Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,929) (1,386) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,541 9,186 --------------- --------------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,612 $ 7,800 =============== =============== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements. 5

IRIDEX CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (IN THOUSANDS) (UNAUDITED) THREE MONTHS ENDED NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 2, SEPTEMBER 27, OCTOBER 2, SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 2003 2004 2003 --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Net income (loss). . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (720) $ 261 $ (604) $ (120) Other comprehensive gain (loss): Change in unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 - (19) (4) --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Comprehensive income (loss). . . . . . . . . $ (711) $ 261 $ (623) $ (124) =============== =============== =============== =============== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements. 6

IRIDEX CORPORATION NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of IRIDEX Corporation ("the Company") have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America for interim financial information and pursuant to the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto, together with management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 2004. The results of operations for the three month period ended October 2, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the year ending January 1, 2005 or any future interim period. 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The Company's significant accounting policies are disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2004 which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 2004. The Company's significant accounting policies have not materially changed as of October 2, 2004. Deferred Revenue Deferred revenue related to warranty contracts is recognized on a straight line basis over the period of the applicable contract. Cost is recognized as incurred. A reconciliation of changes in the Company's deferred revenue balances for the nine months ending October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003 follows (in thousands): Nine Months Ended October 2, 2004 September 27, 2003 Balance, beginning of period $ 596 $ 392 Additions to deferral 787 505 Revenue recognized (594) (321) ---------------- ------------------ Balance, end of period $ 789 $ 576 ================ ================== 7

Warranty The Company accrues for an estimated warranty cost upon shipment of products in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 5, "Accounting for Contingencies." Actual warranty costs incurred have not materially differed from those accrued. The Company's warranty policy is effective for shipped products which are considered defective or fail to meet the product specifications. Warranty costs are reflected in the statement of operations as a cost of sales. A reconciliation of the changes in the Company's warranty liability for the nine months ending October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003 follows (in thousands): Nine Months Ended October 2, 2004 September 27, 2003 Balance, beginning of period $ 801 $ 717 Accruals for warranties issued during the period 441 483 Settlements made in kind during the period (393) (513) --------------- ------------------ Balance, end of period $ 849 $ 687 =============== ================== Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation The Company accounts for stock-based compensation arrangements in accordance with provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion ("APB") No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and complies with the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," as amended by SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure - an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123." Under APB 25, compensation expense for stock option grants to employees is based on the difference, if any, on the date of the grant, between the fair value of the Company's stock and the option's exercise price. SFAS 123 defines a "fair value" based method of accounting for an employee stock option or similar equity investment. The pro forma disclosure of the difference between compensation expense included in net income (loss) and the related cost measured by the fair value method is presented below. The following table provides a reconciliation of net income (loss) to pro forma net income (loss) as if the fair value method had been applied to all employee awards (in thousands, except per share data): 8

Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended October 2, September 27, October 2, September 27, 2004 2003 2004 2003 --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Net income (loss), as $ (720) $ 261 $ (604) $ (120) reported Add: Total stock based (152) (83) (418) (304) --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- compensation expense, net of tax, determined under fair value based method for all awards to employees Pro forma net income $ (872) $ 178 $ (1,022) $ (424) (loss) Basic net income (loss) per share: As reported $ (0.10) $ 0.04 $ (0.08) $ (0.02) =============== =============== =============== =============== Pro forma $ (0.12) $ 0.03 $ (0.14) $ (0.06) =============== =============== =============== =============== Diluted net income (loss) per share: As reported $ (0.10) $ 0.04 $ (0.08) $ (0.02) =============== =============== =============== =============== Pro forma $ (0.12) $ 0.03 $ (0.14) $ (0.06) =============== =============== =============== =============== The determination of fair value of all options granted by the Company is computed based on the following assumptions: Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- October 2, 2004 September 27, 2003 October 2, 2004 September 27, 2003 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average risk free 4.25% 4.38% 5.10% 3.92% interest rate - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Expected life (in 2 yrs 2 yrs. 2 yrs. 2 yrs. years) - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dividend yield -- -- -- -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average volatility 87.0% 84.0% 87.0% 88.0% - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9

3. INVENTORIES Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is based on actual sales computed on a first in, first out basis. The components of inventories consist of the following (in thousands): OCTOBER 2 JANUARY 3, 2004 2004 ---------- ----------- Raw materials and work in progress. $ 4,902 $ 4,426 Finished goods. . . . . . . . . . . 3,503 4,295 ---------- ----------- Total inventories . . . . . . . . . $ 8,405 $ 8,721 ========== =========== In the first nine months of 2004 and 2003, there were no significant sales of inventory previously written off. As a result, there has been no significant impact on gross margin associated with the sale of inventory previously written off. 4. COMPUTATIONS OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share includes the dilutive effect of potentially dilutive common stock provided the inclusion of such potential common stock is not antidilutive. Potentially dilutive common stock consists of incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options. During the three months ended September 27, 2003, options to purchase 1,238,594 shares of common stock at weighted average exercise prices of $5.89 per share were outstanding, but were not included in the computations of diluted net income per common share because the exercise price of the related options exceeded the average market price of the common shares. During the three months ended October 2, 2004, options to purchase 1,861,275 shares at a weighted average exercise price of $5.40 were outstanding, but were not included in the computations of diluted net loss per share because their effect was antidilutive. During the nine months ended October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003 options to purchase 1,861,275 and 2,000,040 shares of common stock at weighted average exercise prices of $5.40 and $5.25, respectively, were outstanding, but were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per share because their effect was antidilutive. These options could dilute earnings per share in future periods. 5. BUSINESS SEGMENTS We operate in two reportable segments: the ophthalmology medical device segment and the dermatology medical device segment. In both segments, we develop, manufacture and market medical devices. Our revenues arise from the sale of consoles, delivery devices, disposables and service and support activities. Information on reportable segments for the three and nine months ended October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003 is as follows (in thousands): 10

Three Months Ended October 2, 2004 Three Months Ended September 27,2003 Ophthalmology Dermatology Total Ophthalmology Dermatology Total Medical Medical Medical Medica Devices Devices Devices Devices Sales $ 7,193 $ 985 $ 8,178 $ 6,897 $ 1,370 $ 8,267 Direct Cost of Goods Sold 2,641 717 3,358 2,493 835 3,328 --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Direct Gross Margin 4,552 268 4,820 4,404 535 4,939 Total Unallocated Costs (6,147) (4,678) --------------- --------------- Pre-tax income (loss) $ (1,327) $ 261 =============== =============== Nine Months Ended October 2, 2004 Nine Months Ended September 27, 2003 Ophthalmology Dermatology Total Ophthalmology Dermatology Total Medical Medical Medical Medical Devices Devices Devices Devices Sales $ 20,122 $ 3,557 $ 23,679 $ 18,640 $ 4,288 $ 22,928 Direct Cost of Goods Sold 7,096 2,141 9,237 6,506 2,222 8,728 --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Direct Gross Margin 13,026 1,416 14,442 12,134 2,066 14,200 Total Unallocated Costs (15,599) (14,501) --------------- --------------- Pre-tax loss $ (1,157) $ (301) =============== =============== Indirect costs of manufacturing, research and development, and selling, general and administrative costs are not allocated to the segments. The Company's assets and liabilities are not evaluated on a segment basis. Accordingly, no disclosure on segment assets and liabilities is provided. 11

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains trend analysis and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, such as statements relating to levels of future sales and operating results, actual order rate and market acceptance of our products; expectations for future sales growth, generally, including expectations of additional sales from our new products and new applications of our existing products; the potential for production cost decreases and higher gross margins; our ability to develop and introduce new products through strategic alliances; favorable Center for Medicare and Medicaid coverage decisions regarding AMD procedures that use our products; results of clinical studies and risks associated with bringing new products to market; general economic conditions; and levels of international sales. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology, such as "may," "will," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "predicts," "intends," "potential," "continue," or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including as a result of the factors set forth under "Factors That May Affect Future Operating Results" and other risks detailed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 2004 and detailed from time to time in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management's analysis only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to update such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following table sets forth certain operating data as a percentage of sales for the periods indicated. THREE MONTHS ENDED NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 2, SEPTEMBER 27, OCTOBER 2, SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 2003 2004 2003 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57.6 56.6 55.7 56.6 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Gross profit. . . . . . . . . . . . . 42.4 43.4 44.3 43.4 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Operating expenses: Research and development. . . . . . . 12.5 11.8 14.4 13.0 Sales, general and administrative . . 47.2 29.0 35.7 32.4 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Total operating expenses. . . . . . 59.7 40.8 50.1 45.4 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Income (loss) from operations . . . . . . (17.2) 2.6 (5.8) (2.0) Interest and other income, net. . . . . . 1.0 0.6 0.9 0.7 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . (16.2) 3.2 (4.9) (1.3) Benefit from (provision for) income taxes 7.4 0.0 2.3 0.8 -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . (8.8)% 3.2% (2.6)% (0.5)% ============== ============== ============== ============== The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the amount of sales for our operating segments and sales as a percentage of total sales. 12

Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended October 2, 2004 September 27, 2003 October 2, 2004 September 27, 2003 Amount Percentage Amount Percentage Amount Percentage Amount Percentage of total of total of total of total sales sales sales sales Domestic $ 5,161 63.1% $ 5,222 63.2% $ 14,162 59.8% $ 14,442 63.0% International 3,017 36.9% 3,045 36.8% 9,517 40.2% 8,486 37.0% ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Total $ 8,178 100.0% $ 8,267 100.0% $ 23,679 100.0% $ 22,928 100.0% ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ Ophthalmology: Domestic $ 4,541 55.5% $ 4,061 49.1% $ 11,964 50.5% $ 11,111 48.5% International 2,652 32.4% 2,836 34.3% 8,157 34.5% 7,529 32.8% ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Total $ 7,193 87.9% $ 6,897 83.4% $ 20,121 85.0% $ 18,640 81.3% ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ Dermatology: Domestic $ 620 7.6% $ 1,161 14.1% $ 2,198 9.3% $ 3,331 14.5% International 365 4.5% 209 2.5% 1,360 5.7% 957 4.2% ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Total $ 985 12.1% $ 1,370 16.6% $ 3,558 15.0% $ 4,288 18.7% ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ Ophthalmology Sales Ophthalmology sales increased 4.3% to $7.2 million for the three months ended October 2, 2004 from $6.9 million for the three months ended September 27, 2003. For the nine months ended October 2, 2004, ophthalmology sales increased 7.9% to $20.1 million from $18.6 million. For the three month period ended October 2, 2004, domestic ophthalmology sales increased 11.8% to $4.5 million from $4.1 million for the three months ended September 27, 2003 due primarily to a $0.4 million increase in unit sales of laser consoles and service revenue. Domestic ophthalmology sales increased 7.7% for the nine months ended October 2, 2004 to $12.0 million from $11.1 million due to a $1.2 million increase in unit sales of delivery devices and service revenue, offset by a $0.3 million decrease in sales of laser consoles. International ophthalmology sales decreased 6.5% to $2.7 million for the three months ended October 2, 2004 from $2.8 million for the three months ended September 27, 2003. The decrease in international ophthalmology sales during this period was due to a $0.1 million decrease in unit sales of delivery devices. Sales of laser consoles remained constant for this period. For the nine months ended October 2, 2004, international ophthalmology sales increased 8.3% to $8.2 million from $7.5 million due to a $0.7 million increase in unit sales of laser consoles and service revenue. Dermatology Sales Dermatology sales decreased 28.1% to $1.0 million for the three months ended October 2, 2004 from $1.4 million for the three months ended September 27, 2003. For the nine months ended October 2, 2004 dermatology sales decreased 17.0% to $3.6 million from $ 4.3 million. Domestic dermatology sales 13

decreased 46.6% to $0.6 million for the three month period ended October 2, 2004 from $1.2 million for the comparable prior year three month period due primarily to a $0.6 million decrease in unit sales of laser consoles. For the nine months ended October 2, 2004 domestic dermatology sales decreased 34.0% to $2.2 million from $3.3 million due to a $1.2 million decrease in unit sales of laser consoles offset by a $0.1 million increase in domestic dermatology service revenue. International dermatology sales increased 75.0% to $0.4 million for the three months ended October 2, 2004 from $0.2 million for the three months ended September 27, 2003 due to a $0.2 million increase in sales of laser consoles and service revenue. For the nine months ended October 2, 2004, international dermatology sales increased 42.0% to $1.4 million from $1.0 million due to a $0.4 million increase in unit sales of laser consoles and international dermatology service revenue. Our dermatology product sales, both domestically and internationally, continue to be affected by economic conditions. Additionally dermatology procedures are typically elective procedures that are deferred by patients in difficult economic times. See "-Factors that May Affect Future Results - Our Business Has Been Adversely Impacted by the Worldwide Economic Slowdown and Related Uncertainties." Gross Profit. Our gross profit decreased by $0.1 million to $3.5 million for the three month period ended October 2, 2004 compared to $3.6 million for the three months ended September 27, 2003. Gross profit as a percentage of sales for the three months ended October 2, 2004 decreased to 42.4% from 43.4% for the comparable prior year three month period. The total 1.0% decrease in gross profit as a percentage of sales during this period included a decrease of 2.8% related to an inventory reserve for saleable, but aging and potentially excess inventory partially associated with the Company's recent introduction of new products, a decrease of 0.5% for average selling prices and a decrease of 0.2% related to higher overhead costs offset by an increase of 2.2% related to the impact of product mix and an increase of 0.3% related to lower product costs including other inventory reserve and warranty charges. For the nine months ended October 2, 2004, gross profit increased by $0.6 million to $10.5 million from $9.9 million for the nine months ended September 27, 2003. Gross profit as a percentage of sales for the nine months ended October 2, 2004 increased to 44.3% from 43.4%. The total 0.9% increase in gross profit as a percentage of sales related to an increase of 1.2% for the impact of product mix, an increase of 1% due to decreased overhead costs, an increase of 0.2% related to improved average selling prices, offset by a decrease of 1.0% for an inventory reserve associated with the Company's recent introduction of new products and a decrease of 0.5% for higher product costs including other inventory reserve and warranty charges. Although increasing competition has continued to result in a downward trend in average selling prices for some products, we intend to continue our efforts to reduce the cost of components and manufacturing and thereby mitigate the impact of price reductions on our gross profit. In addition, as we evaluate gross margins on each of our product lines, we may choose to place greater focus on product lines with better margins. See "-Factors That May Affect Future Results - If We Cannot Increase Our Sales Volumes, Reduce Our Costs or Introduce Higher Margin Products to Offset Anticipated Reductions in the Average Unit Selling Price of our Products, Our Operating Results May Suffer." We expect our gross profit margins to continue to fluctuate due to changes in the relative proportions of domestic and international sales, mix of sales of existing products, pricing, product costs and a variety of other factors. See "-Factors That May Affect Future Results - Our Operating Results May Fluctuate from Quarter to Quarter and Year to Year." Research and Development. Our research and development expenses increased by 5.1% to $1.03 million for the three months ended October 2, 2004 from $0.98 million for the three months ended September 27, 2003. Research and development expenses increased as a percentage of sales to 12.5% for the three months ended October 2, 2004 from 11.8% for the comparable prior year three month period. The increase in research and development expense in absolute dollars and as a percentage of sales for the three month period ended October 2, 2004 was due primarily to $0.05 million in increased research and development project spending. For the nine months ended October 2, 2004 research and development expenses increased 14.7% to $3.4 million from $3.0 million for the nine months ended September 27, 2003. As a percentage of sales, research and development expense increased to 14.4% for the nine months ended 14

October 2, 2004 from 13.0% for the nine months ended September 27, 2003. The increase in research and development expense in absolute dollars and as a percentage of sales for the nine month period ended October 2, 2004 was due primarily to $0.4 million in increased research and development project materials spending. Sales, General and Administrative. Our sales, general and administrative expenses increased by 60.5% to $3.9 million for the three months ended October 2, 2004 from $2.4 million for the three months ended September 27, 2003. As a percentage of sales, sales, general and administrative expenses increased to 47.2% for the three months ended October 2, 2004 from 29.0% for the comparable prior year three month period. The increase in sales, general and administrative expense in absolute dollars and as a percentage of sales for the three month period ended October 2, 2004 was due primarily to a $1.2 million reserve for sales tax and a $0.3 million increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts. The reserve for sales tax resulted from the completion of a comprehensive review of our sales tax practices. Historically we had been collecting and remitting sales tax in only those states where we believed we had nexus. Based on the independent review, we will now begin to collect and remit sales taxes from customers in additional states and will attempt to enter into voluntary settlement agreements with certain states for the payment of prior period sales taxes and associated interest. As a result, we recorded a one time charge of $1.2 million to establish a reserve for upaid sales taxes and interest. The $1.2 million, which represents the current estimate of the amounts to be remitted to these states, could differ materially from the actual amount recorded. For the nine months ended October 2, 2004 sales, general and administrative expense increased 13.8% to $8.5 million from $7.4 million for the nine months ended September 27, 2003. As a percentage of sales, sales, general and administrative expenses increased to 35.7% for the nine months ended October 2, 2004 from 32.4% for the nine months ended September 27, 2003. The increase in sales, general and administrative expense in absolute dollars and as a percentage of sales for the nine month period ended October 2, 2004 was due primarily to a $1.2 million reserve for sales tax and a $0.3 million increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts offset by $0.4 million in decreased spending on marketing programs and domestic sales. Interest and Other Income, net. For the three months ended October 2, 2004 we had net other income of $83,000 as compared with net other income of $49,000 for the three months ended September 27, 2003. For the nine months ended October 2, 2004, net other income was $212,000 as compared with $154,000 for the nine months ended September 27, 2003. The change in net other income for both the three and six month periods was due primarily to an increase in interest income associated with increased cash, cash equivalents and available for sale securities. Income Taxes. The effective income tax rates for the three and nine month periods ended October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003 were lower for periods where we had pre-tax income and higher for periods where we had pre-tax losses than the Federal and State combined statutory rate of 40% primarily because of certain tax benefits associated with tax credits for research and development activities. Based on our tax liability through October 2, 2004 a tax benefit of $607,000 was recorded in the third fiscal quarter of 2004. In addition to estimating our quarterly income tax provision (benefit) we assess temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes which result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our balance sheet. Currently, we have determined that no valuation allowance is required against our deferred tax assets as it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets can be realized based on determination of our future taxable income. A valuation allowance is required to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. However, if at any point in time, we determine that we will not realize all or a portion of our remaining deferred tax assets, we will increase our valuation allowance with a charge to income tax expense. Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods, we may 15

need to establish a valuation allowance which could materially impact our financial position and results of operations. Our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets and the continuing need for a related valuation allowance are monitored on an ongoing basis. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES At October 2, 2004, our primary sources of liquidity included cash and cash equivalents and available-for-sale securities in the aggregate amount of $18.1 million. In addition, we have available $4 million under our unsecured line of credit which bears interest at the bank's prime rate and expires in October 2005. As of October 2, 2004, no borrowings were outstanding under this credit facility. During the nine months ended October 2, 2004, operating activities provided $1.0 million of cash. The primary sources of cash from operating activities included an increase in accrued expenses of $1.2 million, a decrease in net inventory of $0.3 million, depreciation of $0.3 million, an increase of $0.2 million in deferred revenue and a decrease in prepaid expenses of $0.2 million offset by uses of cash which included a $0.6 million net loss and $0.6 million increase in deferred income taxes. The increase in accrued expenses resulted primarily from an accrual for a sales tax liability. The decrease in inventory related primarily to increased inventory reserves, in particular a reserve of $0.3 million for saleable, but aging and potentially excess inventory partially associated with the Company's recent introduction of new products. Investing activities used $4.0 million in cash and cash equivalents during the three months ended October 2, 2004, primarily due to net purchases of available for sale securities of $3.8 million and purchases of fixed assets of $0.2 million. Net cash provided by financing activities during the nine months ended October 2, 2004 was $1.1 million which consisted of the issuance of common stock under employee option plans and the employee stock purchase plan. We believe that, based on current estimates, our cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale securities together with cash generated from operations and our credit facility will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements for the next 12 months. Our liquidity could be negatively affected by a decline in demand for our products, the need to invest in new product development or reductions in spending by our customers as a result of the continuing economic downturn or other factors. There can be no assurance that additional debt or equity financing will be available when required or, if available, can be secured on terms satisfactory to us. See "-Factors That May Affect Future Results - We May Need Additional Capital, which May Not Be Available, and Our Ability to Grow May Be Limited as a Result." In December 1998, we instituted a stock repurchase program whereby up to 150,000 shares of our common stock may be repurchased in the open market. We plan to utilize all of the reacquired shares for reissuance in connection with employee stock programs. No shares were repurchased during the three months ended October 2, 2004. To date, we have purchased 103,000 shares of our common stock under this program. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES The Company's significant accounting policies are disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2004 which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 2004. FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS We Rely on Continued Market Acceptance of Our Existing Products and Any Decline in Sales of Our Existing Products Would Adversely Affect Our Business and Results of Operations. We currently market 16

visible and infrared light semiconductor-based photocoagulator medical laser systems to the ophthalmic market. We also market visible and infrared light semiconductor-based photocoagulator medical laser systems to the dermatology market. We believe that continued and increased sales, if any, of these medical laser systems is dependent upon a number of factors including the following: - Product performance, features, ease of use, scalability and durability; - Recommendations and opinions by ophthalmologists, dermatologists, other clinicians, plastic surgeons and their associated opinion leaders, including study outcomes; - Price of our products and prices of competing products and technologies; - Availability of competing products, technologies and alternative treatments; - Willingness of ophthalmologists and dermatologists to convert to semiconductor-based or infrared laser systems from alternative technologies; and - Level of reimbursement for treatments administered with our products. In addition, we derive a meaningful portion of our revenues from the sale of delivery devices. Our ability to increase revenues from the sale of delivery devices will depend primarily upon the features, ease of use and prices of our products, including the relationship to prices of competing delivery devices. The level of service revenues will depend on our quality of care, responsiveness and the willingness of our customers to request our services rather than purchase competing products or services. Any significant decline in market acceptance of our products or our revenues derived from the sales of laser consoles, delivery devices or services would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We Face Strong Competition in Our Markets and Expect the Level of Competition to Grow in the Foreseeable Future. Competition in the market for devices used for ophthalmic and dermatology treatment procedures is intense and is expected to increase. Our competitive position depends on a number of factors including product performance, characteristics and functionality, ease of use, scalability, durability and cost. Our principal competitors in ophthalmology are Lumenis Ltd., Carl Zeiss, Inc., Alcon, Quantel and Nidek, Inc. All of these companies currently offer a competitive semiconductor-based laser system in ophthalmology. Our principal competitors in dermatology are Laserscope, Candela Corporation, Palomar Technologies, Lumenis Ltd. and Cutera, Inc. Some competitors have substantially greater financial, engineering, product development, manufacturing, marketing and technical resources than we do. Some companies also have greater name recognition than we do and long-standing customer relationships. In addition to other companies that manufacture photocoagulators, we compete with pharmaceuticals, other technologies and other surgical techniques. Some medical companies, academic and research institutions, or others, may develop new technologies or therapies that are more effective in treating conditions targeted by us or are less expensive than our current or future products. Any such developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our Future Success Depends on Our Ability to Develop and Successfully Introduce New Products and New Applications. Our future success is dependent upon, among other factors, our ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval or clearance of, manufacture and market new products. In October 2004, we announced 17

FDA approval for two new laser products, the IQ810 in ophthalmology and the VariLite in dermatology. In May 2004, we introduced a new type of illuminating Endoprobe. In June 2003 we began shipment of two new products; a 50 micron slit lamp adaptor and a 25 gauge single-use Endoprobe. In October 2002, we announced the introduction of a number of new products, specifically the OcuLight Symphony multi-wavelength laser delivery system, an expanded EndoProbe product line and a 5 mm Large Spot Slit Lamp Adapter. We also announced the Millennium Endolase module in 2002, which we manufacture to be included in Bausch & Lomb's Millennium Microsurgical System. Successful commercialization of these and other new products and new applications will require that we effectively transfer production processes from research and development to manufacturing and effectively coordinate with our suppliers. In addition, we must successfully sell and achieve market acceptance of new products and applications and enhanced versions of existing products. The extent of, and rate at which, market acceptance and penetration are achieved by future products is a function of many variables, which include, among other things, price, safety, efficacy, reliability, marketing and sales efforts, the development of new applications for these products, the availability of third-party reimbursement of procedures using our new products, the existence of competing products and general economic conditions affecting purchasing patterns. Our ability to market and sell new products may also be subject to government regulation, including approval or clearance by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, and foreign government agencies. Any failure in our ability to successfully develop and introduce new products or enhanced versions of existing products and achieve market acceptance of new products and new applications could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and would cause our net revenues to decline. Our Business Has Been Adversely Impacted By the Worldwide Economic Slowdown and Related Uncertainties. The overall weak economic conditions worldwide have resulted in reduced demand for some of our products, particularly demand for our dermatology products. Political and social turmoil in various parts of the world or terrorist acts may adversely impact global economic conditions. These political, social and economic conditions and related economic uncertainties make it difficult for us, our customers and our distributors to forecast orders and sales of our products and, accordingly, plan future business activities. This level of uncertainty strongly challenges our ability to operate profitably or grow our business. If economic or market conditions do not improve, this may have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operation and cash flows. If We Cannot Increase Our Sales Volumes, Reduce Our Costs or Introduce Higher Margin Products to Offset Anticipated Reductions in the Average Unit Price of Our Products, Our Operating Results May Suffer. We have experienced declines in the average unit price of our products and expect to continue to suffer from declines in the future. The average unit price of our products may decrease in the future in response to changes in product mix, competitive pricing pressures, new product introductions by our competitors or other factors. If we are unable to offset the anticipated decrease in our average selling prices by increasing our sales volumes or through new product introductions, our net revenues will decline. In addition, to maintain our gross margins, we must continue to reduce the manufacturing cost of our products. If we cannot maintain our gross margins, our business could be seriously harmed, particularly if the average selling price of our products decreases significantly without a corresponding increase in sales. We Face Manufacturing Risks. The manufacture of our infrared and visible light photocoagulators and the related delivery devices is a highly complex and precise process. We assemble critical subassemblies and all of our final products at our facility in Mountain View, California. We may experience manufacturing difficulties, quality control issues or assembly constraints, particularly with regard to new products that we may introduce. We may not be able to manufacture sufficient quantities of our products, which may require that we qualify other manufacturers for our products. Furthermore, we may experience delays, disruptions, capacity constraints or quality control problems in our manufacturing 18

operations and, as a result, product shipments to our customers could be delayed, which would negatively impact our net revenues. We Depend on Sole Source or Limited Source Suppliers. We rely on third parties to manufacture substantially all of the components used in our products, including optics, laser diodes and crystals. We have some long term or volume purchase agreements with our suppliers and currently purchase components on a purchase order basis. Some of our suppliers and manufacturers are sole or limited sources. In addition, some of these suppliers are relatively small private companies that may discontinue their operations at any time. There are risks associated with the use of independent manufacturers, including the following: - Unavailability of, shortages or limitations on the ability to obtain supplies of components in the quantities that we require; - Delays in delivery or failure of suppliers to deliver critical components on the dates we require; - Failure of suppliers to manufacture components to our specifications, and potentially reduced quality; and - Inability to obtain components at acceptable prices. Our business and operating results may suffer from the lack of alternative sources of supply for critical sole and limited source components. The process of qualifying suppliers is complex, requires extensive testing with our products, and may be lengthy, particularly as new products are introduced. New suppliers would have to be educated in our production processes. In addition, the use of alternate components may require design alterations to our products and additional product testing under FDA and relevant foreign regulatory agency guidelines, which may delay sales and increase product costs. Any failures by our vendors to adequately supply limited and sole source components may impair our ability to offer our existing products, delay the submission of new products for regulatory approval and market introduction, materially harm our business and financial condition and cause our stock price to decline. Establishing our own capabilities to manufacture these components would be expensive and could significantly decrease our profit margins. We do not currently intend to manufacture any of these components. Our business, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected if we are unable to continue to obtain components in the quantity and quality desired and at the prices we have budgeted. We Depend on International Sales for a Significant Portion of Our Operating Results. We derive, and expect to continue to derive, a large portion of our revenue from international sales. For the three months ended October 2, 2004, our international sales were $3.0 million or 36.9% of total sales. We anticipate that international sales will continue to account for a significant portion of our revenues in the foreseeable future. None of our international revenues and costs has been denominated in foreign currencies. As a result, an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies makes our products more expensive and thus less competitive in foreign markets. The factors stated above could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Our international operations and sales are subject to a number of other risks including: - Longer accounts receivable collection periods; 19

- Impact of recessions in economies outside of the United States; - Foreign certification requirements, including continued ability to use the "CE" mark in Europe; - Reduced or limited protections of intellectual property rights in jurisdictions outside the United States; - Potentially adverse tax consequences; and - Multiple protectionist, adverse and changing foreign governmental laws and regulations. Any one or more of these factors stated above could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. For additional discussion about our foreign currency risks, see Item 3, "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk." We Depend on Sales of Our Ophthalmology Products for a Significant Portion of Our Operating Results. We derive, and expect to continue to derive, a large portion of our revenue and profits from sales of our ophthalmology products. For the three months ended October 2, 2004 our ophthalmology sales were $7.2 million or 88.0% of total sales. We anticipate that sales of our ophthalmology products will continue to account for a significant portion of our revenues in the foreseeable future as we continue to introduce new ophthalmology products, such as the 50 micron slit lamp adapter and our expanded EndoProbe product line, and support clinical trials in the field of ophthalmology, including the TTT4CNV clinical trial for the treatment of wet AMD. Our Operating Results May be Adversely Affected by Changes in Third Party Coverage and Reimbursement Policies and any Uncertainty Regarding Healthcare Reform Measures. Our ophthalmology products are typically purchased by doctors, clinics, hospitals and other users, which bill various third-party payers, such as governmental programs and private insurance plans, for the health care services provided to their patients. Third-party payers are increasingly scrutinizing and challenging the coverage of new products and the level of reimbursement for covered products. Doctors, clinics, hospitals and other users of our products may not obtain adequate reimbursement for use of our products from third-party payers. While we believe that the laser procedures using our products have generally been reimbursed, payers may deny coverage and reimbursement for our products if they determine that the device was not reasonable and necessary for the purpose used, was investigational or was not cost-effective. In addition, third party payers may not initiate coverage of new procedures using our products for a significant period. In September 2000, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, advised that claims for reimbursement for certain age related macular degeneration, or AMD, procedures which use our OcuLight SLx laser system, could be submitted for reimbursement, with coverage and payment to be determined by the local medical carriers at their discretion. To date five carriers representing 17 states have written reimbursement coverage policies on Transpupillary Thermotherapy, or TTT. The states reimbursing for TTT are Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Iowa, Idaho, Mississippi, North Carolina, North Dakota, Nevada, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Washington and Wyoming. Domestic sales of the OcuLight SLx laser system may continue to be limited until more local medical carriers reimburse for performing such AMD procedures or until CMS advises that claims for these procedures may be submitted directly to CMS at the 20

national level. The clinical results of the TTT4CNV trial and other clinical trials may influence the individual state or CMS decision to reimburse for certain laser procedures. Changes in government legislation or regulation or in private third-party payers' policies toward reimbursement for procedures employing our products may prohibit adequate reimbursement. There have been a number of legislative and regulatory proposals to change the healthcare system, reduce the costs of healthcare and change medical reimbursement policies. Doctors, clinics, hospitals and other users of our products may decline to purchase our products to the extent there is uncertainty regarding reimbursement of medical procedures using our products and any healthcare reform measures. Further proposed legislation, regulation and policy changes affecting third party reimbursement are likely. We are unable to predict what legislation or regulation, if any, relating to the health care industry or third-party coverage and reimbursement may be enacted in the future, or what effect such legislation or regulation may have on us. However, denial of coverage and reimbursement of our products would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We are Dependent on the Successful Outcome of Clinical Trials of Our Products and New Applications Using Our Products. Our success will depend in part on the successful outcome of clinical trials of our products and new applications using our products. Clinical trials are long, expensive and uncertain processes. We are currently supporting several ongoing clinical trials, including, for example, the TTT4CNV clinical trial. The TTT4CNV clinical trial is a multi-center, prospective, double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized trial conducted at 22 centers in the United States. This clinical trial is a post marketing study performed within the FDA cleared indications of the OcuLight SLx and is being conducted to determine whether TTT laser treatment using our OcuLight SLx infrared laser system and Large Spot Slit Lamp Adapter can reduce the risk of vision loss for patients with wet AMD compared to a randomized control, which should reflect the natural history of the disease. In March 2003, we announced that the Executive Committee for the TTT4CNV clinical trial accepted the recommendations of the independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee that an adequate number of patients were enrolled to detect a clinically relevant difference between outcomes in TTT-treated eyes and patients not being treated. In June 2003, we announced the publication of two additional clinical studies, which also support the effectiveness of TTT for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration. Both studies were prospective, non-randomized, non-masked case series that were performed using our OcuLight SLx laser and Large Spot Size Slit Lamp Adapter. On October 22, 2004, Dr. Elias Reichel, Study Chairman of the TTT4CNV Clinical Trial and Associate Professor of Ophthalmology at the New England Eye Center, Tufts School of Medicine, presented preliminary results from the TTT4CNV Clinical Trial for occult neovascular (wet) AMD at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology. A total of 303 patients were enrolled in the study. Patients who were treated in the study with the Transpupillary Thermotherapy (TTT) laser protocol were compared to sham treatment. The results for the intent-to-treat population, while trending favorably, showed that the primary visual outcome using TTT, as applied in this trial, did not result in a significant beneficial effect relative to sham. Additionally, it was reported that 11% of patients who were treated with TTT compared to 3% of patients who received sham showed improvement (greater or equal to 2 lines increase) from baseline when evaluated at one year. This secondary outcome was statistically significant. The Executive Committee for the TTT4CNV trial intends to conduct further analysis of this subgroup of patients whose vision improved as it may yield information regarding those patients who respond to TTT. Specifically this subgroup of patients may have certain characteristics that result in a high likelihood of improvement or stabilization over time. Safety results were also presented. Some patients, both in the treatment and sham groups, showed severe loss of vision at the one month follow-up visit. This occurred in 5% of TTT treated eyes compared to 1% of sham eyes. This finding was not statistically significant. There are a number of questions for which analysis remains to be done. The Executive Committee had little time to review the outcome data prior to Dr. Reichel's presentation and, as a result, careful inspection of baseline characteristics between groups and a per protocol analysis that evaluates the subset of enrolled patients who met all key eligibility criteria needs to be done. Data analysis will continue through the end of 2004 and 21

into the first half of 2005. We cannot assure you that further analysis of the TTT4CNV clinical trial data will yield any additional statistically significant identifiable group that improved from the TTT treatment. Even if further analysis yields favorable results, an increase in laser sales may take a number of years. If the future results of the TTT4CNV clinical trial or any other clinical trial regarding our products fails to demonstrate improved outcomes of treatments using our products, our ability to generate revenues from new products or new applications using our products would be adversely affected. Our Operating Results May Fluctuate from Quarter to Quarter and Year to Year. Our sales and operating results may vary significantly from quarter to quarter and from year to year in the future. Our operating results are affected by a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Factors contributing to these fluctuations include the following: - General economic uncertainties and political concerns; - The timing of the introduction and market acceptance of new products, product enhancements and new applications; - Changes in demand for our existing line of dermatology and ophthalmic products; - The cost and availability of components and subassemblies, including the ability of our sole or limited source suppliers to deliver components at the times and prices that we have planned; - Our ability to maintain sales volumes at a level sufficient to cover fixed manufacturing and operating costs; - Fluctuations in our product mix between dermatology and ophthalmic products and foreign and domestic sales; - The effect of regulatory approvals and changes in domestic and foreign regulatory requirements; - Introduction of new products, product enhancements and new applications by our competitors, entry of new competitors into our markets, pricing pressures and other competitive factors; - Our long and highly variable sales cycle; - Changes in the prices at which we can sell our products; - Changes in customers' or potential customers' budgets as a result of, among other things, reimbursement policies of government programs and private insurers for treatments that use our products; and - Increased product development costs. 22

In addition to these factors, our quarterly results have been, and are expected to continue to be, affected by seasonal factors. Our expense levels are based, in part, on expected future sales. If sales levels in a particular quarter do not meet expectations, we may be unable to adjust operating expenses quickly enough to compensate for the shortfall of sales, and our results of operations may be adversely affected. In addition, we have historically made a significant portion of each quarter's product shipments near the end of the quarter. If that pattern continues, any delays in shipment of products could have a material adverse effect on results of operations for such quarter. Due to these and other factors, we believe that quarter to quarter and year to year comparisons of our past operating results may not be meaningful. You should not rely on our results for any quarter or year as an indication of our future performance. Our operating results in future quarters and years may be below expectations, which would likely cause the price of our common stock to fall. We Rely on Our Direct Sales Force and Network of International Distributors to Sell Our Products and any Failure to Maintain Our Direct Sales Force and Distributor Relationships Could Harm Our Business. Our ability to sell our products and generate revenue depends upon our direct sales force within the United States and relationships with independent distributors outside the United States. As of October 2, 2004 our direct sales force consisted of 10 employees with 6 additional open positions and we maintained relationships with 66 independent distributors internationally selling our products into 107 countries. We generally grant our distributors exclusive territories for the sale of our products in specified countries. The amount and timing of resources dedicated by our distributors to the sales of our products is not within our control. Our international sales are entirely dependent on the efforts of these third parties. If any distributor breaches or fails to generate sales of our products, we may be forced to replace the distributor and our ability to sell our products into that exclusive sales territory would be adversely affected. We do not have any long-term employment contracts with the members of our direct sales force. We may be unable to replace our direct sales force personnel with individuals of equivalent technical expertise and qualifications, which may limit our revenues and our ability to maintain market share. The loss of the services of these key personnel would harm our business. Similarly, our distributorship agreements are generally terminable at will by either party and distributors may terminate their relationships with us, which would affect our international sales and results of operations. We Depend on Collaborative Relationships to Develop, Introduce and Market New Products, Product Enhancements and New Applications. We depend on both clinical and commercial collaborative relationships. We have entered into collaborative relationships with academic medical centers and physicians in connection with the research and development and clinical testing of our products. Commercially, we currently collaborate with Bausch & Lomb to design and manufacture a solid-state green wavelength (532 nm) laser photocoagulator module, called the Millennium Endolase module. The Millennium Endolase module is designed to be a component of Bausch & Lomb's ophthalmic surgical suite product offering and is not expected to be sold as a stand-alone product. Sales of the Millennium Endolase module are dependent upon the actual order rate from and shipment rate to Bausch & Lomb, which depends on the efforts of our partner and is beyond our control. We cannot assure you that our relationship with Bausch & Lomb will result in further sales of our Millennium Endolase module. We also collaborate with Miravant Medical Technologies, a maker of photodynamic drugs, on a device that emits a laser beam to activate a photodynamic drug developed by Miravant for the treatment of wet AMD. In January 2002, Miravant announced that the top line results of their Phase III clinical trial indicated that SnET2, the photodynamic drug developed, did not meet the primary efficacy endpoint in the study population. As we could not be assured that SnET2 would be timely or successfully pursued through clinical trials by Miravant, we charged to expense in the fourth quarter of 2001, $0.3 million of inventory related to the OcuLight 664, the laser used by Miravant in the Phase III clinical trials. Miravant has since received an 23

approvable letter from the FDA for SnET2 with conditions for final marketing approval which includes a request for an additional confirmatory clinical trial. We are the exclusive provider of the OcuLight 664 activation laser used in this application. Successful commercialization of this product will depend, among other things, on the results of the confirmatory clinical trial, acceptance of this product and Miravant's ability to successfully market and sell this therapy. The failure of any current or future clinical or commercial collaboration relationships could have a material adverse effect on our ability to introduce new products or applications and therefore could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We Face Risks Associated with our Collaborative Relationships. Our collaborators may not pursue further development and commercialization of products resulting from collaborations with us or may not devote sufficient resources to the marketing and sale of such products. Our reliance on others for clinical development, manufacturing and distribution of our products may result in unforeseen problems. Further, our collaborative partners may develop or pursue alternative technologies either on their own or in collaboration with others. If a collaborator elects to terminate its agreement with us, our ability to develop, introduce, market and sell the product may be significantly impaired and we may be forced to discontinue altogether the product resulting from the collaboration. We may not be able to negotiate alternative collaboration agreements on acceptable terms, if at all. The failure of any current or future collaboration efforts could have a material adverse effect on our ability to introduce new products or applications and therefore could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We Rely on Patents and Proprietary Rights to Protect our Intellectual Property and Business. Our success and ability to compete is dependent in part upon our proprietary information. We rely on a combination of patents, trade secrets, copyright and trademark laws, nondisclosure and other contractual agreements and technical measures to protect our intellectual property rights. We file patent applications to protect technology, inventions and improvements that are significant to the development of our business. We have been issued fifteen United States patents and five foreign patents on the technologies related to our products and processes. We have approximately four pending patent applications in the United States and five foreign pending patent applications that have been filed. Our patent applications may not be approved. Any patents granted now or in the future may offer only limited protection against potential infringement and development by our competitors of competing products. Moreover, our competitors, many of which have substantial resources and have made substantial investments in competing technologies, may seek to apply for and obtain patents that will prevent, limit or interfere with our ability to make, use or sell our products either in the United States or in international markets. In addition to patents, we rely on trade secrets and proprietary know-how which we seek to protect, in part, through proprietary information agreements with employees, consultants and other parties. Our proprietary information agreements with our employees and consultants contain industry standard provisions requiring such individuals to assign to us without additional consideration any inventions conceived or reduced to practice by them while employed or retained by us, subject to customary exceptions. Proprietary information agreements with employees, consultants and others may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. Also, our trade secrets may become known to or independently developed by competitors. The laser and medical device industry is characterized by frequent litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. Companies in the medical device industry have employed intellectual property litigation to gain a competitive advantage. Numerous patents are held by others, including academic institutions and our competitors. Until recently patent applications were maintained in secrecy in the United States until the patents issued. Patent applications filed in the United States after November 2000 generally will be published eighteen months after the filing date. However, since patent applications continue to be maintained in secrecy for at least some period of time, both within the United States and with regards to 24

international patent applications, we cannot assure you that our technology does not infringe any patents or patent applications held by third parties. We have, from time to time, been notified of, or have otherwise been made aware of, claims that we may be infringing upon patents or other proprietary intellectual property owned by others. If it appears necessary or desirable, we may seek licenses under such patents or proprietary intellectual property. Although patent holders commonly offer such licenses, licenses under such patents or intellectual property may not be offered or the terms of any offered licenses may not be reasonable. Any claims, with or without merit, and regardless of whether we are successful on the merits, would be time-consuming, result in costly litigation and diversion of technical and management personnel, cause shipment delays or require us to develop noninfringing technology or to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. An adverse determination in a judicial or administrative proceeding and failure to obtain necessary licenses or develop alternate technologies could prevent us from manufacturing and selling our products, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We Are Subject To Government Regulation Which May Cause Us to Delay or Withdraw the Introduction of New Products or New Applications for Our Products. The medical devices that we market and manufacture are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA and by foreign and state governments. Under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the related regulations, the FDA regulates the design, development, clinical testing, manufacture, labeling, sale, distribution and promotion of medical devices. Before a new device can be introduced into the market, the product must undergo rigorous testing and an extensive regulatory review process implemented by the FDA under federal law. Unless otherwise exempt, a device manufacturer must obtain market clearance through either the 510(k) premarket notification process or the lengthier premarket approval application (PMA) process. Depending upon the type, complexity and novelty of the device and the nature of the disease or disorder to be treated, the FDA process can take several years, require extensive clinical testing and result in significant expenditures. Even if regulatory approval is obtained, later discovery of previously unknown safety issues may result in restrictions on the product, including withdrawal of the product from the market. Other countries also have extensive regulations regarding clinical trials and testing prior to new product introductions. Our failure to obtain government approvals or any delays in receipt of such approvals would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. The FDA imposes additional regulations on manufacturers of approved medical devices. We are required to comply with the applicable Quality System regulations and our manufacturing facilities are subject to ongoing periodic inspections by the FDA and corresponding state agencies, including unannounced inspections, and must be licensed as part of the product approval process before being utilized for commercial manufacturing. Noncompliance with the applicable requirements can result in, among other things, fines, injunctions, civil penalties, recall or seizure of products, total or partial suspension of production, withdrawal of marketing approvals, and criminal prosecution. The FDA also has the authority to request repair, replacement or refund of the cost of any device we manufacture or distribute. Any of these actions by the FDA would materially and adversely affect our ability to continue operating our business and the results of our operations. In addition, we are also subject to varying product standards, packaging requirements, labeling requirements, tariff regulations, duties and tax requirements. As a result of our sales in Europe, we are required to have all products "CE" marked, an international symbol affixed to all products demonstrating compliance with the European Medical Device Directive and all applicable standards. While currently all of our released products are CE marked, continued certification is based on the successful review of our quality system by our European Registrar during their annual audit. Any loss of certification would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. 25

Our products could be subject to recalls even after receiving FDA approval or clearance. A recall would harm our reputation and adversely affect our operating results. The FDA and similar governmental authorities in other countries in which we market and sell our products have the authority to require the recall of our products in the event of material deficiencies or defects in design or manufacture. A government mandated recall, or a voluntary recall by us, could occur as a result of component failures, manufacturing errors or design defects, including defects in labeling. A recall could divert management's attention, cause us to incur significant expenses, harm our reputation with customers and negatively affect our future sales. If we modify one of our FDA approved or cleared devices, we may need to seek new approvals or clearances which, if not granted, would prevent us from selling our modified products. Any modifications to an FDA-approved or cleared device that would significantly affect its safety or effectiveness or that would constitute a major change in its intended use would require a new 510(k) clearance or possibly a PMA approval. We may not be able to obtain additional 510(k) clearances or PMA approvals for new products or for modifications to, or additional intended uses or indications for, our existing products in a timely fashion, or at all. Delays in obtaining future clearances would adversely affect our ability to introduce new or enhanced products in a timely manner, which in turn would harm our revenue and future profitability. We have made modifications to our devices and the labeling of our devices in the past and may make additional modifications in the future that we believe do not or will not require additional clearances or approvals. If the FDA disagrees and requires new clearances or approvals for the modifications, we may be required to recall and stop marketing the modified devices, which could harm our operating results and require us to redesign or relabel our products. If Product Liability Claims are Successfully Asserted Against Us, We may Incur Substantial Liabilities That May Adversely Affect Our Business or Results of Operations. We may be subject to product liability claims from time to time. Our products are highly complex and some are used to treat extremely delicate eye tissue and skin conditions on and near a patient's face. Although we maintain product liability insurance with coverage limits of $11.0 million per occurrence and an annual aggregate maximum of $12.0 million, our coverage from our insurance policies may not be adequate. Product liability insurance is expensive. We might not be able to obtain product liability insurance in the future on acceptable terms or in sufficient amounts to protect us, if at all. A successful claim brought against us in excess of our insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. If We Fail to Accurately Forecast Demand For Our Product and Component Requirements For the Manufacture of Our Product, We Could Incur Additional Costs or Experience Manufacturing Delays and May Experience Lost Sales or Significant Inventory Carrying Costs. We use quarterly and annual forecasts based primarily on our anticipated product orders to plan our manufacturing efforts and determine our requirements for components and materials. It is very important that we accurately predict both the demand for our product and the lead times required to obtain the necessary components and materials. Lead times for components vary significantly and depend on numerous factors, including the specific supplier, the size of the order, contract terms and current market demand for such components. If we overestimate the demand for our product, we may have excess inventory, which would increase our costs. Over the past several quarters, we have placed a high priority on our asset management efforts to, among other things, reduce overall inventory levels and increase our cash position. If we underestimate demand for our product and, consequently, our component and materials requirements, we may have inadequate inventory, which could interrupt our manufacturing, delay delivery of our product to our customers and result in the loss of customer sales. Any of these occurrences would negatively impact our business and operating results. If We Fail to Manage Growth Effectively, Our Business Could Be Disrupted Which Could Harm Our Operating Results. We have experienced, and may continue to experience growth in our business. We have made and expect to continue to make significant investments to enable our future growth through, among 26

other things, new product development and clinical trials for new applications and products. We must also be prepared to expand our work force and to train, motivate and manage additional employees as the need for additional personnel arises. Our personnel, systems, procedures and controls may not be adequate to support our future operations. Any failure to effectively manage future growth could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. If Our Facilities Were To Experience Catastrophic Loss, Our Operations Would Be Seriously Harmed. Our facilities could be subject to catastrophic loss such as fire, flood or earthquake. All of our research and development activities, manufacturing, our corporate headquarters and other critical business operations are located near major earthquake faults in Mountain View, California. Any such loss at any of our facilities could disrupt our operations, delay production, shipments and revenue and result in large expense to repair and replace our facilities. We May Need Additional Capital, which May Not Be Available, and Our Ability to Grow May be Limited as a Result. We believe that our existing cash balances, available-for-sale securities, credit facilities and cash flow expected to be generated from future operations will be sufficient to meet our capital requirements at least through the next 12 months. However, we may be required, or could elect, to seek additional funding prior to that time. The development and marketing of new products and associated support personnel requires a significant commitment of resources. If cash from available sources is insufficient, we may need additional capital, which may not be available on favorable terms, if at all. If we cannot raise funds on acceptable terms, we may not be able to develop or enhance our products, take advantage of future opportunities, fund potential acquisitions or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements. Any inability to raise additional capital when we require it would seriously harm our business. Our Stock Price Has Been and May Continue to be Volatile and an Investment in Our Common Stock Could Suffer a Decline in Value. The trading price of our common stock has been subject to wide fluctuations in response to a variety of factors, some of which are beyond our control, including quarterly variations in our operating results, announcements by us or our competitors of new products or of significant clinical achievements, changes in market valuations of other similar companies in our industry and general market conditions. We receive only limited attention by securities analysts and may experience an imbalance between supply and demand for our common stock resulting from low trading volumes. In addition, the stock market has experienced extreme volatility in the last few years that has often been unrelated to the performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations could have a significant impact on the market price of our common stock regardless of our performance. Changes in Accounting Rules. We prepare our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These principles are subject to interpretation by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, and various bodies formed to interpret and create appropriate accounting policies. A change in these policies can have a significant effect on our reported results and may even retroactively affect previously reported transactions. In particular, changes to FASB guidelines relating to accounting for stock-based compensation, if enacted, will likely increase our compensation expense, could make our net income less predictable in any given reporting period and could change the way we compensate our employees or cause other changes in the way we conduct our business. ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES We are exposed to market risks inherent in our operations, primarily related to interest rate risk and currency risk. These risks arise from transactions and operations entered into in the normal course of 27

business. We do not use derivatives to alter the interest characteristics of our marketable securities or our debt instruments. We have no holdings of derivative or commodity instruments. Interest Rate Risk. We are subject to interest rate risks on cash and cash equivalents, available-for-sale marketable securities and any future financing requirements. Interest rate risks related to marketable securities are managed by managing maturities in our marketable securities portfolio. We have no long-term debt as of October 2, 2004. The fair value of our investment portfolio or related income would not be significantly impacted by changes in interest rates since the marketable securities maturities do not exceed a term of 12 - 14 months and the interest rates are primarily fixed. QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES Interest Rate Risk. Our primary interest rate risk exposures relate to: - The risk that available-for-sale securities will fall in value if market interest rates increase. - The impact of interest rate movements on our ability to obtain adequate financing to fund future operations. We have the ability to hold at least a portion of the fixed income investments until maturity and therefore would not expect our operating results or cash flows to be affected to any significant degree by a sudden change in market interest rates on our short- and long-term marketable securities portfolio. Management evaluates our financial position on an ongoing basis. Currency Rate Risk. As all of our sales transactions are denominated in U.S. currency, we do not hedge any balance sheet exposures against future movements in foreign exchange rates. The exposure related to currency rate movements would not have a material impact on future net income or cash flows. ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES (a) EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. (b) CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS 28

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. PART II. OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS The Company is not subject to any material legal proceedings as of the date of this report. ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS None. ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES None. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS None. ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION None. ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) Exhibits 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (b) Reports on Form 8-K On July 27, 2004 the registrant furnished a Current Report on Form 8-K reporting under Item 12 of Form 8-K that on July 27, 2004, the Company issued a press release regarding the Company's financial results for the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2004. On September 22, 2004 the registrant filed a Current Report on Form 8-K reporting under Item 5.02 of Form 8-K that effective September 22, 2004, the registrant's Board of Electors elected Garret A. Garrettson as a new member of the registrant's Board of Directors. On October 19, 2004 the registrant furnished a Current Report on Form 8-K reporting under Item 12 of From 8-K that on October 19, 2004, the Company issued a press release regarding the Company's financial results for the fiscal quarter ended October 2, 2004. 29

TRADEMARK ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IRIDEX, the IRIDEX logo, IRIS Medical, OcuLight, SmartKey, EndoProbe and Apex are our registered trademarks. IRIDERM, G-Probe, DioPexy, DioVet, TruFocus, TrueCW, UltraView, DioLite 532, Long Pulse, MicroPulse, ScanLite, ColdTip (Handpiece), VariSpot (Handpiece), TruView and EasyFit product names are our trademarks. All other trademarks or trade names appearing in the Form 10-Q are the property of their respective owners. SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. IRIDEX Corporation (Registrant) Date: November 16, 2004 By: /s/ Larry Tannenbaum ------------------------ Larry Tannenbaum Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Administration (Principal Financial, Principal Accounting Officer and Authorized Signatory) 30

EXHIBIT INDEX -------------- 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. ------------------------------ 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial pursuant to Section 302 of the ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. ------------------------------ 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ----------------------------------------------------------------------- pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. ------------------------------------- 31

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  -------------

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
        SECTION 13(A) OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AS
                              ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF


I,  Theodore  A.  Boutacoff,  certify  that:

1.   I  have  reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IRIDEX Corporation;

2.   Based  on  my  knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make  the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this  quarterly  report;

3.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other financial
     information  included  in  this  quarterly  report,  fairly  present in all
     material  respects  the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows  of  the  registrant  as  of,  and for, the periods presented in this
     quarterly  report;

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
          disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
          supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating to the
          registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us  by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which  this  quarterly  report  is  being  prepared;

     b)   Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and  procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of  the  period  covered  by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed  in  this  report  any  changes in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most  recent fiscal quarter


(the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 16, 2004 By: /s/ THEODORE A. BOUTACOFF ---------------------------------------- Name: Theodore A. Boutacoff Title: President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

                                  EXHIBIT 31.2
                                 --------------

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
        SECTION 13(A) OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AS
                              ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  Larry  Tannenbaum  certify  that:

1.   I  have  reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IRIDEX Corporation;

2.   Based  on  my  knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make  the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this  quarterly  report;

3.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other financial
     information  included  in  this  quarterly  report,  fairly  present in all
     material  respects  the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows  of  the  registrant  as  of,  and for, the periods presented in this
     quarterly  report;

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a.   Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
          disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
          supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating to the
          registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us  by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which  this  quarterly  report  is  being  prepared;

     b.   Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and  procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of  the  period  covered  by this report based on such evaluation; and


c. Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 16, 2004 By: /s/ LARRY TANNENBAUM -------------------------------------------- Name: Larry Tannenbaum Title: Chief Financial Officer and Vice President,Administration (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IRIDEX Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending Octrober 2, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Theodore A.
Boutacoff, Chief Executive Officer, and Larry Tannenbaum, Chief Financial
Officer, of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

          (2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: November 16, 2004


                                   By: /s/ THEODORE A. BOUTACOFF
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Name: Theodore A. Boutacoff
                                   Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
                                   (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 16, 2004

                                   By: /s/ LARRY TANNENBAUM
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Name: Larry Tannenbaum
                                   Title: Chief Financial Officer and Vice
                                          President, Administration
                                   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)